375rifleman
I know Burris continues to improve their programs and are including many improvements in future models.
Zero stop- That is not needed as the scope automatically returns to zero after it "times out" or is reset for another distance. Your "zero" is always the cross-hair center. You never touch the vertical adjustment once you have sighted in.
Coriolis effect: Max effect of the Coriolis effect for most guns is about 1 moa at 1000 yards. To account for it in the program, they will need to install a GPS and magnetic compass. I don't know if this being incorporated but I am sure it will be as the scope gets more advanced.
It is my understanding the next model will have a level installed, so you can make sure you don't have any rifle cant.
As for ammo temp, that is a variable I don't see any way to correlate to the scope.
I believe future programs will address altitude and BP into the program, but for wind speed and direction, once you get past 300 yards, winds change direction and speed. There is no way for this scope to be able to detect down range wind speed and direction.
For the money, I thing the EIII is an awesome tool and I have yet to miss with it, even without the "new technology" we have discussed here. I still believe in human adjustments and the need for a long range shooter to be able to make mental adjustments to make the shot. If you want a gun that does it all, you need to come up with $15,000.00 and buy a Tracking Point, which I hope to demo soon.
As for other questions about sight in and drop. The program is only set for 50 yards (Black Powder) and 100 yards (center fire) rifles. On my 6-47 I can shoot out past 1000 yards without losing vertical drop POA as you read in my article. Honestly how much more do you need? I would never shoot at an animal (other than a coyote or ground hog) at 1000 yards with my 6-47 as the knock down is too light by that distance for any ethical shot on a game animal. I don't see any need for the scope to engage targets past 1000 regardless of the round you are shooting, as it then becomes an ethical question of "not can you hit it, but should you even try?"
Roger