When you say "They," I assume you are referring to specific barrels that are cut with Savage threads but designed to shoulder on the action? If so, does is matter what action the barrel is shouldered on? In other words, do the prefits that are designed to be shouldered need to be action specific because of the reaming that was done by the barrel manufacturer? If that is the case, I am not sure why one would choose this option? Just a personal thing but I would not trust those tolerances. I really like the Savage barrel nut idea (no experience) since a person (non-smith) can fine tune his barrel to action perfectly (and easily) and the method used to attach the barrel (nut vs shouldered) has no influence on accuracy. The way I understand this is that the three things that influence accuracy are 1. Correct head spacing, 2. Quality of barrel, and 3. Action threads being trued (concentric) with the action. If those three things are perfect, the bullet has no idea if the shank end of the barrel is toughing the action since the case shoulder would be exactly the same distance and angle to the chamber no matter which method was used.They are shouldered prefits so you do not need a nut.
First, .300 WM is my favorite hunting cartridge. Second, I now want to build a LR paper/steel puncher and I think it will be a 6.5 PRC. I can't decide between the MPA hybrid or the Manners PRS1? Sorry Hbomb11, my intention wasn't to highjack your thread.G'day Hard Cast
Yes it's a MPA chassis
So I will assume since you have three of these chassis that you have had good luck with them.This will be my third MPA Chassis
View attachment 123033