dennisinaz
Well-Known Member
I just checked the one you posted. It is 34mm. I have never seen a 34mm one. Mine are 30mm. All the ones I have mounted are 30mm. Weird that they would have two different sizes in one line of scopes.
-
If you are being asked to change your password, and unsure how to do it, follow these instructions. Click here
Best repeatable optics under 1k
- Thread starter grouse
- Start date
Help Support Long Range Hunting Forum
D
Deleted member 48126
Guest
That's why I don't shoot inferior scopes like Leupold 
SWFA...Bc I'm poor.
SWFA...Bc I'm poor.
PredatorSlayer
Well-Known Member
Dude - thats what we have been trying to tell you in multiple threads...no credibility...who is the dummy now
Last edited:
Nightforce SHV 4-14x50
SWFA 3-9 or fixed 6x or 10x
SWFA 3-9 or fixed 6x or 10x
ralphjunius
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2011
- Messages
- 55
ralphjunius
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2011
- Messages
- 55
I have about 20 scopes, different brands, up to about $2,500 a piece. I don't have any confidence in any of the turrets being accurate or repeatable based upon using them with my custom, accurate rifles.
That's why I like and use the Leupold Boone and Crockett reticle (which I fully understand is internet heresy.) Regardless, the vertical tick marks are ingenious because they generally follow the curve gravity imposes on bullets in even increments.
If you are decent at math and use Litz's BC's you can generally figure out pretty close where to zero the scope so that all of the holdovers are in even yardage increments that you can remember, unlike nearly all other ballistic reticles.
The downside of the B&C is that the drops are only good at one power, usually maximum; so i generally use 10 to 14 max power scopes. With higher power I would never shoot because movement is amplified too much at higher power and I loose confidence and would never shoot unless my rifle was rigidly attached and damped by at least a 50 pound rest.
That's why I like and use the Leupold Boone and Crockett reticle (which I fully understand is internet heresy.) Regardless, the vertical tick marks are ingenious because they generally follow the curve gravity imposes on bullets in even increments.
If you are decent at math and use Litz's BC's you can generally figure out pretty close where to zero the scope so that all of the holdovers are in even yardage increments that you can remember, unlike nearly all other ballistic reticles.
The downside of the B&C is that the drops are only good at one power, usually maximum; so i generally use 10 to 14 max power scopes. With higher power I would never shoot because movement is amplified too much at higher power and I loose confidence and would never shoot unless my rifle was rigidly attached and damped by at least a 50 pound rest.
dennisinaz
Well-Known Member
Dude - thats what we have been trying to tell you in multiple threads...no credibility...who is the dummy now
You're the one who said they were all 34mm when in fact only ONE is.
PredatorSlayer
Well-Known Member
I am going to do everybody a favor and take this stupidity off the thread. PM Sent.
