...I have been reading that shoulder bumping worked our brass less or no more then neck sizing...From what I under stand now basically any one with a bolt gun could chamber my shoulder bumped ammo. Which also leads me to believe this far less then custom ammo to my chamber. Now I under stand that seating depths may vary but a hot load just nudging into the lands of anothers rifle could be bad news for them. My thoughts are I should seriously look into the Forester neck size shoulder bump dies and gain the best of both worlds...
I think you are misunderstanding a little. This may get a little long winded, but I'll try and clear up all your concerns, as best I can. The short answer, is you don't need special dies, and there is no "best of both worlds".
1) Blindly following die instructions "touch the shell holder, then add 1/8 turn" or whatever, will almost certainly bump the shoulder a bunch more than necessary. My OEM Savage barrel had ~0.01" more headspace than my current Shilen barrel, and more than any other rifle I have measured. I'm pretty sure it was out of SAAMI spec. Before I really understood that, I was following die instructions, and probably bumping the shoulder at least 0.015" every reload. Case head separations occurred at 3-4 firings...
2) As above, bumping the shoulder 0.002" from fired, in no way means the brass will now chamber in every gun. My OEM Savage would eat neck sized only brass from any gun, as it's chamber was incredibly long (I proved this with 2 friends' guns once fired brass). If I'd known back then to FL size and bump the shoulder 0.002", my ammo CERTAINLY still wouldn't fit in most guns (even my buddies identical Savage LRH had 0.005" less clearance).
3) From rifle to rifle, shoulder position variation has far less affect than throat length, when it comes to "touching the lands". My buddy's identical rifle had a 0.02" difference in throat, but only 0.005" in shoulder. I've measured 3 different 30-06 rifles, and they had a whopping 0.13" extreme spread in base-to-ogive for the same projectiles. It is unlikely you'll run into "jammed bullets" simply due to headspace. For example, the two 30-06 mentioned above, I could have run the bullets 0.1" off the lands in the Rem700, and it would have jammed the bullet in the Win M70 anyway. The difference in headspace (base to shoulder) between the two rifles is about 0.002". If I wanted to run brass for both of them, I'd bump them to the shortest of the two, but I'd still have to deal with huge difference in bullet jump.
4) "Best of both worlds" doesn't really exist (see 30-06 examples above). If you want reliable ammo that will feed in any gun, build it right at max SAAMI specs (like factory ammo is), for both shoulder position (headspace), and base to bullet ogive. If you do that, it will almost assuredly reduce brass life, due to excessive chamber clearance, allowing the brass to expand far more than necessary, and then be resized back down more than necessary. It will also be loose in almost all chambers, with highly variable bullet jump, and therefore not provide the best precision possible.
5) Any die, machined to proper specifications, will allow you to do the minimum necessary sizing for a chamber machined to proper specifications. Measure your fired brass, seat the die deep enough to only move the shoulder back a couple thousandths, and you're good to go
for that particular rifle.
6) It is my understanding, that a thousandth or two clearance in all directions/areas (properly FL sized) will actually result in better precision (let alone reliability), than brass that snuggly fits the chamber (neck sized). If the cartridge rubs/jams/etc in any area, this can actually result in more misalignment variation than having it sit freely on the bottom of the chamber. I don't have any real data to back that up, but it does
seem logical.
..
Hope that helps.