gamehawker
Well-Known Member
Hey Guys,
I have been reloading this past year with 140 gr. AB with 85.5 gr. H1000 and had really good results with low ES/ED, nice velocity (3,450 fps) and tight groupings (less than 1/2 MOA) for my two Remington 700 Sendero SF 7mm STWs.
I am excited about the new Long Range Accubonds and I plan on buying the 168/175 gr. for my 7mm STWs.
Though I've had good results with H1000 for the 140 gr. Accubonds I've heard that Retumbo is better for heavier bullets, i.e., above 160 gr.
"MudRunner2005" and my buddy "7stw" like the RL powders but I'm leaning towards the Hodgdon extreme powders so what's the best powder out of these two (H1000 or Retumbo) in these bullet weights (168/175 gr.)?
I also posted this in the reloading section.
TIA
I have been reloading this past year with 140 gr. AB with 85.5 gr. H1000 and had really good results with low ES/ED, nice velocity (3,450 fps) and tight groupings (less than 1/2 MOA) for my two Remington 700 Sendero SF 7mm STWs.
I am excited about the new Long Range Accubonds and I plan on buying the 168/175 gr. for my 7mm STWs.
Though I've had good results with H1000 for the 140 gr. Accubonds I've heard that Retumbo is better for heavier bullets, i.e., above 160 gr.
"MudRunner2005" and my buddy "7stw" like the RL powders but I'm leaning towards the Hodgdon extreme powders so what's the best powder out of these two (H1000 or Retumbo) in these bullet weights (168/175 gr.)?
I also posted this in the reloading section.
TIA