Marky_mark
Well-Known Member
You should go shoot a couple and tell meSo wouldn't a lower recoiling rifle be better in that situation especially off a less stable shooting platform?
You should go shoot a couple and tell meSo wouldn't a lower recoiling rifle be better in that situation especially off a less stable shooting platform?
Couple what? Different cartridges off a hunting pack?You should go shoot a couple and tell me
So wouldn't a lower recoiling rifle be better in that situation especially off a less stable shooting platform?
Well, you're sounding too much like the guys I run into that talk big and belittle others to feel better about themselves. What's got ya bud? Zero experience? Blind and feeder hunting? Hmmm. Where did that come from?Like i said before, everyone is free to do what ever they like.
But dont say that something is adequate when you have zero experience to back it up
Shooting a deer on a feeder from a stable bench in a blind is a lot different than shooting a mountain animal on a backpack hunt
Having to say that says a lot
First hand experience, good choice. Sheep have a big rib cage. Die easily when they can not breath.6 CM shooting a 103 ELDx at 3150. Ok for sheep?
So wouldn't a lower recoiling rifle be better in that situation especially off a less stable shooting platform?
If you work with a lot of folks in training you soon learn that there are definite variables. Recoil is certainly a factor for those who don't have much recoil tolerance or have poor recoil management. Many just can't shoot loud and high recoiling rifles well. The pressure of a field environment only compounds the negative results. I've seen quite a few critters missed or wounded because a guy was scared of his gun. Have also seen close range well placed impacts from more than adequate chamberings that gave disappointing results because of projectile inadequacies. Conversely, I've seen numerous deer taken handily with a good bullet from a 223. (obviously not at 600 yards ) Anyone who speaks in strong absolute terms it's not someone who will serve you well as an instructor/mentor. It's hard to answer questions like this definitively on a forum without working with the individual or knowing more about them. Obviously, personal factors along with equipment parameters will influence an individuals range limitations…Not necessarily! Recoil and platform are not related to one another! Rifle weight perhaps…..but, not the "recoil factor"! IMO memtb
If you work with a lot of folks in training you soon learn that there are definite variables. Recoil is certainly a factor for those who don't have much recoil tolerance or have poor recoil management. Many just can't shoot loud and high recoiling rifles well. The pressure of a field environment only compounds the negative results. I've seen quite a few critters missed or wounded because a guy was scared of his gun. Have also seen close range well placed impacts from more than adequate chamberings that gave disappointing results because of projectile inadequacies. Conversely, I've seen numerous deer taken handily with a good bullet from a 223. (obviously not at 600 yards ) Anyone who speaks in strong absolute terms it's not someone who will serve you well as an instructor/mentor. It's hard to answer questions like this definitively on a forum without working with the individual or knowing more about them. Obviously, personal factors along with equipment parameters will influence an individuals range limitations…
desert bighorns, or anything once in a lifetimeCouple what? Different cartridges off a hunting pack?
Take it however you want manWell, you're sounding too much like the guys I run into that talk big and belittle others to feel better about themselves. What's got ya bud? Zero experience? Blind and feeder hunting? Hmmm. Where did that come from?
Knowing one's limitations is every man's responsibility. All of those points are relevant, but some can be difficult to utilized in the type of hunting this thread is about. I hike and climb too much for a heavy gun. And fortunate to be relatively insensitive to recoil.I was thinking purely about the rifle and the methods of support…..not the shooter's abilities or lack thereof!
I suppose that if the shooter has difficulty with recoil…..then by all means "anchor" that sonofagun!
Perhaps a 15+ pound "Crushmore", with brake, sandbagged-in is just the ticket for some.
Actually, I understand that some can't tolerate recoil because of physical limitations, shoulder issues, perhaps a previously "detached" retina, ect. If "deer fever" is the issue….another situation where a heavy, low recoil cartridge in/on a very stable support "may" be the answer……provided they can keep their eyes open while they jerk the trigger! For those folks…..do what you must do! Perhaps a very solid rest is in order "if" they are attempting to manage recoil beyond their comfort zone! memtb
"A man has got to know his limitations! memtb
Much the same for me…..though my 9 pound (all up) .375 AI is getting a little heavier through the years. Thankfully, the recoil hasn't gotten heavier! memtbKnowing one's limitations is every man's responsibility. All of those points are relevant, but some can be difficult to utilized in the type of hunting this thread is about. I hike and climb too much for a heavy gun. And fortunate to be relatively insensitive to recoil.
Well bud, I can't relate to your comparisons. Not a hunting style I'm ever tried. Not remotely relevant to this thread. Saying someone has zero experience and implying feeder hunting, is a bit ...Take it however you want man
Zero belittling, just stating how these are drastically different situations
How did these hunts work out?I can hopefully let you know how a 6.5x300 wby does on desert sheep hopefully today or tomorrow
I have a buddy in mexico trying to finish his slam
Another friend is leaving friday with a 6.5 prc for his