General RE LEE
Well-Known Member
Why not combine both FPS and Ft.Lbf. and make a decision?
Well thats the point of the thread but thanks any way for your drive by thread crap.
Why not combine both FPS and Ft.Lbf. and make a decision?
Energy was a decent metric back in the day before bullet technology had made much headway. Now, it's relatively meaningless on its own. Impact velocity needs matched with bullet choice and shot placement. An eldx or eldm behind the shoulder, impacting above 1800fps will do the job every time. Doesn't matter if it's a 6mm, 7mm, or .30 cal. Keep it within the designed bullet velocity window for expansion, put it in the pocket, and you'll be in good shape. Your biggest issue typically won't be bullet performance at 500, but shot placement.
I agree with you until the last line - lots of commonly used hunting cartridges that can hit at 500 yards are not "effective killers (however you define that)" at 500 yards. 6mm ARC is a great example of a cartridge (especially in a bolt gun) that can hit at 500 yards but I would be concerned about its ability to kill cleanly at 500. Same with 65 Grendel. Same with 223, and so on.Energy was a decent metric back in the day before bullet technology had made much headway. Now, it's relatively meaningless on its own. Impact velocity needs matched with bullet choice and shot placement. An eldx or eldm behind the shoulder, impacting above 1800fps will do the job every time. Doesn't matter if it's a 6mm, 7mm, or .30 cal. Keep it within the designed bullet velocity window for expansion, put it in the pocket, and you'll be in good shape. Your biggest issue typically won't be bullet performance at 500, but shot placement.
I understand your point, and will clarify that statement. The 500 yard comment was specifically aimed at the OP's question of the 6arc. If he's reaching 600 yards at 1800fps, which is the lower velocity threshold for the bullet to perform properly, then he'll be well within the threshold at 500. So the bullet performance at 500 should be adequate. However, making an accurate cold bore 500 yard shot with a relatively slow cartridge requires some measure of skill, which makes the shot placement the most difficult part. The bullet if placed properly will do its job at 500, but it may be hard to place there.I agree with you until the last line - lots of commonly used hunting cartridges that can hit at 500 yards are not "effective killers (however you define that)" at 500 yards. 6mm ARC is a great example of a cartridge (especially in a bolt gun) that can hit at 500 yards but I would be concerned about its ability to kill cleanly at 500. Same with 65 Grendel. Same with 223, and so on.
I appreciate that lol. I learned this notion here on this forum, and have come to accept and believe it wholeheartedly.Arguably the most well said paragraph in forum history in regards to bullet performance on game. Might as well close the thread lol.
That's a good price for a tikka. Was it at that bear themed costco carrying store?I think you'll be just fine using the 6 ARC on whitetails. There was a picture of a guy a couple years back that killed a brown bear here in AK with a 6 ARC. That I do not recommend. Come to find out, my oldest son when to high school with the guy and chatted with him about it. I'll just say, it took a few shots to put it down.
For deer, I have killed a few whitetails growing up in AR with my dad's .243 Win. I thought of buying a Howa Mini in 6 ARC as I really like my mini in 6.5 Grendel. I've also been eyeing a 1:8 twist .243 Win in a Tikka or Remington 700. Went to look for Varget on Saturday, walked in to one of the local places that has guns and groceries here and they had a managers sale. I walked out with a Tikka T3X Lite SS for $605. It was marked down from $868.
It was!That's a good price for a tikka. Was it at that bear themed costco carrying store?