Brush buster
Well-Known Member
More I think about it, the more I like the idea of the PRC shooting hammers or 156s with a 1:7.5 twist… gonna shoot my buddy's creedmoor and prc back to back and get a feel for them
Creed barrel will last longer, and larger bullet selection. But on deer sized animals, push. Plus you can get creed components at the present.I'm looking into having a rifle built to compliment my 300wm. I really love my 300wm and dropped my furthest buck at 550 yards last year with 181gr hammer hunters. So I think I want something on the smaller side that compliments the 300wm. I was thinking either the 6.5 creedmoor or .243 but can't really make up my mind. I want this rifle to have little recoil and good performance on anything up to deer sized game. Having had great results with the hammer hunters in my 300wm, I was thinking about having either the 6.5 or .243 also loaded with hammers.
If you guys were building a deer hunting rifle and going to shoot hammer bullets, would you go 6.5 creedmoor or .243?
YES!!!mix the best of both cartridges, 6 creedmoor
Creed barrel will last longer, and larger bullet selection. But on deer sized animals, push. Plus you can get creed components at the present.
Seconded… checks all the boxes for the OP and combines the best characteristics of the two he was considering.mix the best of both cartridges, 6 creedmoor
Not one of your choices, but have you considered 6.5 PRC? The only reason I suggest it, is the ballistics would be nearly identical to 300 WM, so wind/dope would match, and shooting one would be valuable learning for the other.
181 HH at 3100 fps vs 124 HH at 3150 will have drop/wind within a couple inches of each other all the way out to 800 plus yds.
It will also maintain expansion velocities out to distances similar to the 300 WM. 243 (poor BC) and 6.5 Creed (slow launch) will likely stop well short of the 300WM in that department.
Recoil on the 6.5 PRC (~13 ftlbs) will be almost exactly half that of a 300WM (26 ftlbs) in a 10 lb gun.
Just a thought. I've got the same sort of thing going with 3 nearly identical rifles in 264WM, 7 Rem Mag, and 300WM. If you know one, you know them all...
If the above doesn't interest you, then my vote would be for 243. Will be less recoil, cheaper to shoot, and a little flatter trajectory on it's way to max effective range.