density altitude is what matters, not elevation, just like airplanes. I'd be curious to see a test regarding stability of 230s at SL vs 3k, etc. people make that statement but I'd like to see if on paper
density altitude is what matters, not elevation, just like airplanes. I'd be curious to see a test regarding stability of 230s at SL vs 3k, etc. people make that statement but I'd like to see if on paper
This is the same load I came up with in my Remington AWR 26" with a break. I am only getting 3079 @ 8K elevation. Have taken to 800 yards at basketball sized rocks no problem. Magazine length is my problem right now. If I load .30 off lands the 200 yard group gets smaller but wont fit in mag. I am running about .80 just to make it fit and it shoots OK but could be better.I'm running 212 eld-x 3155fps out of my rum with 91gr of retumbo. And cci 250 Magnum primers and norma brass.
I'm at 1100 foot elevation and have barrel finished at 28" probably the difference. It's a lilja sendero weight fluted.This is the same load I came up with in my Remington AWR 26" with a break. I am only getting 3079 @ 8K elevation. Have taken to 800 yards at basketball sized rocks no problem. Magazine length is my problem right now. If I load .30 off lands the 200 yard group gets smaller but wont fit in mag. I am running about .80 just to make it fit and it shoots OK but could be better.
I'm at 1100 foot elevation and have barrel finished at 28" probably the difference. It's a lilja sendero weight fluted.[/QUOTE
It's pretty cool that the same load works in 2 different rifles and shooting conditions. One of the other reasons for the slight speed differences may be I do my load development below 50 degrees. Tried the 220 grains also but when I hit the nodes on the 2 the 212 had more energy out past 500 so stuck with the 212's.