Wolf76
Well-Known Member
Having a common sense is not the same as your previous statement of solving a problem that does not exist. Not really sure why you are comparing the performance between the .338 EDGE and .300 PRC. My response was not chambering specific.
As it should be. We should be thankful we have another choice to choose from. What one does with the choice is entirely up to the end-user as they have the ultimate decision.
There's no performance comparison made or inferred regarding the 338 or 300. The 338 edge reference is to say that wildcatting (just a different approach) is done all the time and often doesn't achieve much, if anything different than what's already available (338 Lapua/norma in this instance). Powder capacity and barrel length overwhelmingly dictate a cartridge's abilities. Case shape accounts for a much smaller % of performance.
The 300 PRC offers the same benefit relative to the other 30 cal magnums as my 338 edge does to the 338 lapua. Hope that provides some clarity.
Definitely a fan of innovation. Innovation usually solves a problem or does something better (common sense reference) . IMO the 300 prc is largely a copycat. I'll never own one, but wish anyone who does the best of luck. Time and more importantly sales, will dictate if this is a success.
I'm done commenting on this thread.