Have y'all tried them on whitetail?
Good to know.I keep reading they perform like an Amax or Eld-M.
Thank you.Not deer but dall sheep. The 155 TMK is devastating. Like the AMAX.
Personally I would NOT shoot an elk or a moose with a 155 TMK. They are very frangible and there's not much mass there. I had to shoot a bull moose with a 155 AMAX (the TMK and AMAX are twins except for their form factor) which was never the plan but my buddy wounded a bull and I had to finish it. It wasn't pretty at all. They fragment on dall sheep and offer minimal penetration.Any updated or additional reviews on the 155 TMK? Just bought some for a 308, hoping to shoot deer, elk, black bears and moose with it.
So the Amax/ELDM is my primary hunting bullet for elk right now, has been for almost a decade. I shoot the 147 eldm out of a 6.5 PRC currently and it has done really well on elk deer and bears. If bullet performance is similar or the same, I can live with that.Personally I would NOT shoot an elk or a moose with a 155 TMK. They are very frangible and there's not much mass there. I had to shoot a bull moose with a 155 AMAX (the TMK and AMAX are twins except for their form factor) which was never the plan but my buddy wounded a bull and I had to finish it. It wasn't pretty at all. They fragment on dall sheep and offer minimal penetration.
I've had the 155 AMAX hold up better than the TMK. Key words in the last sentence in my post: "They fragment on dall sheep and offer little penetration." Yes the rest of my post is poorly written. Both the 155 AMAX and 155 TMK are twins in the sense that they have the same sectional density and are of lighter duty construction. You can hear what you want to hear but I think you'll be very disappointed in the 155 TMK on elk and moose. ELDMs have held up better than the TMKs for me as well. Just like the AMAX.So the Amax/ELDM is my primary hunting bullet for elk right now, has been for almost a decade. I shoot the 147 eldm out of a 6.5 PRC currently and it has done really well on elk deer and bears. If bullet performance is similar or the same, I can live with that.
Thats a bummer. I've seen a lot of positive reviews for the 168 and 175 and the terminal performance looks really good with the 168's and the 175's as well. I was hoping the 155 would have similar performance. BC is great and you can push them a little faster.I've had the 155 AMAX hold up better than the TMK. Key words in the last sentence in my post: "They fragment on dall sheep and offer little penetration." Yes the rest of my post is poorly written. Both the 155 AMAX and 155 TMK are twins in the sense that they have the same sectional density and are of lighter duty construction. You can hear what you want to hear but I think you'll be very disappointed in the 155 TMK on elk and moose. ELDMs have held up better than the TMKs for me as well. Just like the AMAX.
I might give the 175 TMK a try on something like a cow elk but I wouldn't test them on a premium hunt. The 175 has more material and higher SD. I'd have more confidence there than the 155. The advantage the 308 has here is medium velocities. Out of a 300 win they would fragment even worse.Thats a bummer. I've seen a lot of positive reviews and the terminal performance looks really good with the 168's and the 175's. I was hoping the 155 would have similar performance.
Have you tried the 155 ELDM?Thats a bummer. I've seen a lot of positive reviews for the 168 and 175 and the terminal performance looks really good with the 168's and the 175's as well. I was hoping the 155 would have similar performance. BC is great and you can push them a little faster.