elkaholic
Well-Known Member
Ok, that makes more sense. Still pretty fast!30" Brux 1:8
Ok, that makes more sense. Still pretty fast!30" Brux 1:8
Current load is 3149.
Sounds like you're raising your eyebrows a bit at the fact that others aren't running them as fast as they could. Knock off roughly 50 for per inch and you'd be right down where they are. 30" barrels are not common.
I agree the 160-180gr range is sort of a sweet spot for the 7RM to get the best combo of speed & BC. But if the .30-06 can handle 180's as an average bullet weight, the 7RM should have no issues pushing 180-200 grain bullets.
On average loading a pile of them the 7 mag does better with a lighter bullet than the 180, many I've loaded the 168 in will only run 2950's, if you have one that will scream then a 180 makes sense but on average I've done way better with the 168 and now the 175 is looking like the ticket. I'm still clinging to hope for the 195 in my 28 Nosler.
Careful there!I'd love to see a 200-210ish 284 bullet come out. It would just continue to embarrass the 30 cals.
It's because your barrel is fast and likely over pressure, a 28 Nosler or a 7 RUM will max out at the velocities your running. A 7-300 win is maxing out with the best brass. Reality and what your see loading dozens of them.I am curious as to why he said that also. I don't have an issue pushing them over 3K. Current load is 3149. I've pushed them all the way up to 3225 in this current barrel. I am not sure why people think that the rem mag can't push the 180s fast enough. Are they scared to try them? If you use the right combination of components it isn't hard.
I ran 162s to 3146 in my last 7mm rem mag 26in barrel. And that was backed off my max load by a full grainIf you can only get a 168 to run at 2950 in a 7RM, it isn't the rifles fault. Don't wanna sound like a dick but that is completely on your end.
I ran a 26" tube at 3050 sooooo there's that.