westcoasthunter
Well-Known Member
I have a 270 wsm i had built a few years ago. I use the 165gr matrix with retumbo. But i have been thinking abour trying rl23 with the 165's. Does anyone use that combo and how do you like it?
RL26 is a couple grains faster than H1000 in everything I've shot it in??Try RL-26 It is between H-1000 and Retumbo.
I would not disagree with you. Hornady's 10th addition manual on page 38 list H1000 as #148, RL-26 as #151 and Retumbo as #153. I know in my 28 Nosler I run one grain less of RL-26 to get +75fps more than Retumbo. In My 270 WSM with a long throat I run about the same charge of powder with H-1000 and RL-26 and the Rl-26 gives more velocity. As to burn rate I have no way of measuring it. I also read somewhere that RL-26 burns in 16" of barrel length where as the same article stated that H-1000 was over 20". Based on the above one would "***/u/me" that RL-26 was faster than H-1000 but I am not sure that common sense applies here there may be more science behind it than we know. Maybe some with more knowledge than I will chime in.RL26 is a couple grains faster than H1000 in everything I've shot it in??
I know when I run the 3 powders in my Shermans to max pressure, if RL26 was say 60 grains, H1000 would be 62 and Retumbo at 63I would not disagree with you. Hornady's 10th addition manual on page 38 list H1000 as #148, RL-26 as #151 and Retumbo as #153. I know in my 28 Nosler I run one grain less of RL-26 to get +75fps more than Retumbo. In My 270 WSM with a long throat I run about the same charge of powder with H-1000 and RL-26 and the Rl-26 gives more velocity. As to burn rate I have no way of measuring it. I also read somewhere that RL-26 burns in 16" of barrel length where as the same article stated that H-1000 was over 20". Based on the above one would "---/u/me" that RL-26 was faster than H-1000 but I am not sure that common sense applies here there may be more science behind it than we know. Maybe some with more knowledge than I will chime in.