zb338
Well-Known Member
How can a guy not like anything that moves over 4000 FPS.
Zeke
Zeke
Magneto Speed V3Hey BB - what chrono are you using? Labrador won't chrono over 4K.
VargetWhat powder are you using? I might have to try some in my 257 Wby.
It's not really that bad 57.7g of VargetHi BB.
WOW! Did your 'smith' chamber you some spare barrels too? Just kiddin'.
That is a scorching loading. Looking forward to see the terminal effects on Deer size animals.
How much crimp did you add?It's not really that bad 57.7g of Varget
1/4 of a turnHow much crimp did you add?
Rem 700 ActionAnd by the way we need rifle specs!!!
I've been doing this for decades and I assure you no Whitetail will carry this home, the static shock of this round will disable any Whitetail or Mule Deer with authority, as for barrel life, It never crosses my mindBarrel life? I have no problem using it for varmints or predators, but I question the ethics of using it on game animals. P.O. Ackley experimented with sub-caliber bullets with extroidinary results, subsequent results by the public resulted in dismal failures as well spectacular kills. When I first got my .17 Remington, I shot a jack rabbit broadside at about 150 yards. since there was little or no recoil, I saw the bullet hit the rabbit. When the bullet impacted, I saw fur blown into the air. The rabbit fell facing the way I shot it and I saw I trickle of blood at the bullet hole. I turned the rabbit over and all the fur was missing on the chest and there was no exit wound. penetration was minimal, the the hydraulic shock was devastating. Results on coyotes were similar. .Granted, the two bullet are entirely different, but please experiment before trying it on a deer.
They don't act like a Barnes bullet at allIf they act like the 80gr Barnes TTSX in my 25-06's 26" barrels @ 3,800+fps, impacts on deer at range aren't any worse, and sometimes less destructive, than some cup-n-core bullets I've used. Velocity drops rather quickly, but I do like the banjo wire trajectories at my altitudes.