Hornady states this is a secant ogive bullet. I personally don't see it.
Anyone have any thoughts on this?
Also has anyone had problems with seating depth issues or are they as good as Amax in that regard ?
140 VLD vs 143 ELD-X
Thanks Rich.
Maybe Hornady wanted to advertise it as such.
Good to hear that they're shooting good for you. I think I remember a post and a pic you shot, dont remember if it was a SS or regular Sherman.
The bearing surface is a lot longer than the VLDs so I probably won't get as much velocity.
Contacted them yesterday about load data for 264 WM, the reply was so vague its not worth repeating.
Good to hear from you Rich. Thanks.
Too bad about the boat tail/bearing length they decided to put on the 143. Some available performance appears to be designed out of the bullet.
I don't know how you can criticize the 143gr ELD-X when it has a higher BC than the Berger 140gr VLDH.
I don't know how you can criticize the 143gr ELD-X when it has a higher BC than the Berger 140gr VLDH.
Exactly what I was thinking, and the BC holds up but I have only shot them to 903 yards so far.
And the expansion should be more consistant than the Berger, I have the Berger & will get the ELD-X when I see it, should be interesting.