A buddy of mine just returned from his annual hunting trip where he had been told by one of the guides/ranch hands that the 6.5 Creedmoore was frowned upon at this particular establishment, apparently due to injured/lost game. I got to thinking about this and the longer I did, the more preposterous it began to seem to me.
So, I guess the ranch should also frown upon the 6.5 x 47, the .260 Rem and the 6.5-284 as well, right?
I just don't get this kind of nonsense. I'm shooting a 130 Accubond out of my 6.5 Creedmoore over a very modest 36.8 grain charge of RL-15. I easily get DRTs out to 250 yards. What makes people come to such conclusions? Maybe it has to do with the popularity of the round with beginners or inexperienced hunters? Thoughts?
So, I guess the ranch should also frown upon the 6.5 x 47, the .260 Rem and the 6.5-284 as well, right?
I just don't get this kind of nonsense. I'm shooting a 130 Accubond out of my 6.5 Creedmoore over a very modest 36.8 grain charge of RL-15. I easily get DRTs out to 250 yards. What makes people come to such conclusions? Maybe it has to do with the popularity of the round with beginners or inexperienced hunters? Thoughts?