Ckleeves
Well-Known Member
Neither, 6mm 108eldm, next question.
But both of those would kill and elk with a shot to the vitals. I like what you're doing here.
I'm not using either of those but they were quick and easy to find.
Neither, 6mm 108eldm, next question.
But both of those would kill and elk with a shot to the vitals. I like what you're doing here.
What bullet gives a larger cavity with 48" of penetration?
7 states 3 countries shaaaaawow Thats awesome good for you buddyThat's okay, they can have their own experience and stories, and I can have mine if that's okay with you of course?
I hunt 5 states every year, 7 states every other year, and in 3 countries every other year. I'm pretty much tapped out, sorry I can't live up your expectations or approval.
While I must confess to never shooting in self defense nor for fun, I have no trouble shooting full length (end to end) on a mature elk.
Barnes .375 cal, 270 grain TSX @ near 3K mv…..elk at approximately 80 yrds! A numerous elk, a moose, some deer and Pronghorn……no bullet recoveries, with a pretty adequate wound channel. It wasn't actually measured…..but was pretty substantial! memtb
As crazy as it may sound I would take a 6 Creed on an elk at 600 vs that setup. TSX impacting at 1675 fps (at my elevation, YMMV) vs a ELDM impacting at 2250 fps (once again at my elevation). Half the wind drift with the little six too.
Not saying it's my first choice, or that 6mm's are the end all be all but there are far worse choices out there then a 6mm with the correct bullet carried by a guy who can shoot it well from any position and isn't scared of it and shot hundreds of rounds leading up to the hunt because practicing with a suppressed 6 is a real fun and cheap time.
Plus…..know the reasonable expectations/capabilities of your chosen cartridge/bullet, which may not reach your capabilities ……whatever they may be! memtbKnow your rifle (whatever it's chambered in) and know your own personal limitations
Here's my 16.5" 6 RSAUM, incredibly accurate with 108 ELD-M and 115 DTACs, a pleasure to shoot and hunt deep backcountry with.As crazy as it may sound I would take a 6 Creed on an elk at 600 vs that setup. TSX impacting at 1675 fps (at my elevation, YMMV) vs a ELDM impacting at 2250 fps (once again at my elevation). Half the wind drift with the little six too.
Not saying it's my first choice, or that 6mm's are the end all be all but there are far worse choices out there then a 6mm with the correct bullet carried by a guy who can shoot it well from any position and isn't scared of it and shot hundreds of rounds leading up to the hunt because practicing with a suppressed 6 is a real fun and cheap time.
I love those NXS 2.5-10s and the TBAC, very similar to my 6 creed setup minus the folding chassis.Here's my 16.5" 6 RSAUM, incredibly accurate with 108 ELD-M and 115 DTACs, a pleasure to shoot and hunt deep backcountry with.
View attachment 626301
I think I understand what you are saying here. Can we just stress that people use actual empirical evidence based decisions. Buy a chronograph, download ballistic software. And verify that information against real world verified drop data. If you know how much energy you have at each range you can make educated decisions on how far you can shoot effectively.Assuming you actually read the post and you can comprehend it you will note that I said "another excuse for not practicing". A bad shot is a bad shot, as poor of an excuse as it may be a hit with a larger caliber bullet has a higher probability of saving a bad shot.
I have very little faith in my fellow man. What I believe will invariably happen is that many hunters will start using 22 centerfires, take shots that they shouldn't, wound animals, not recover them, then say whatever, and shoot another animal. I do not believe that most people have the personal discipline to understand you draw blood your tag is filled whether you recover that animal or not. Eventually forcing state DNRs to put in strict caliber rules for certain game animals. We will see what happens in the next 10 to 15 years. But as the Dude says that's just your opinion man....
I...
The quick rule of thumb I have always heard is 1000FTLBS for deer and 1500FTLBS for elk.
This limits me to 200 yards for deer with the 223 AR for example.
But there's no basis whatsoever for those energy numbers. They're just pulled out of someone who's long dead's butt.I think I understand what you are saying here. Can we just stress that people use actual empirical evidence based decisions. Buy a chronograph, download ballistic software. And verify that information against real world verified drop data. If you know how much energy you have at each range you can make educated decisions on how far you can shoot effectively.
The quick rule of thumb I have always heard is 1000FTLBS for deer and 1500FTLBS for elk.
This limits me to 200 yards for deer with the 223 AR for example.