Same here…
162s out of a suppressed 20" is money.
-
If you are being asked to change your password, and unsure how to do it, follow these instructions. Click here
6.5PRC, 6.8 Western, 7SAUM
- Thread starter HuskerHunterFisher
- Start date
Help Support Long Range Hunting Forum
162s out of a suppressed 20" is money.
I'm doing the same. Going back and forth on 20-22". At the end of the day 50-60 fps is not a deal breaker. How fast are the 160's running? One thing to consider the 162 eld and 168 berger run about 3.05 ish seated to the neck shoulder area. Too long for any short action set up. You can seat deeper getting them to mag length but the bullet will be taking up some powder room. I went medium action.
JakeC
Well-Known Member
h4831sc. It's pretty perfect for the 168. Bullet base tickling the powder is hot but safe and very accurate. It's not perfect for the 180s but it's adequate and accuracy is so ridiculous Im scared to try anything else. The 140 absolute hammers are actually riding rl16, accuracy is also extreme.
I did try imr 7977 now that I think of it. I barely got past start loads and accuracy was bad. Made me uninterested in h1k at the time but some guys get adequate accuracy and a good amount more MV with that. But 7977, the supposed equivalent oh h1k, was no good for me.
Naturally everyone who can get their grubby hands on rl26 for their saums can see the future and grow their hair back. It really seems to be the missing link, so one winter project is to get some n565 or similar and lengthen the 180 eldm out to single feed. We'll see maybe.
I'm still burning through a hefty stock of 162 AMaxes. Gives up a little BC, but shorter bearing surface. They still kill plenty good 10-12 years later out of a SA…high 3k-3100 with R26 in several barrels currently.
I don't sweat the .020-.030 here or there with the binderless mags and appropriate throating. Absolutely nothing against the concept of medium actions, but until chassis makers can start offering medium action inlets I'll stick with the SAs.
65x55Shooter
Active Member
With the available premium hunting loading commercially available for the 6.5 PRC, I think it covers all the game you intend to hunt. The ballistics are probably the best of those you list. Today's premium bullets from Barnes and Nosler to mention two, allow you to use a 6.5 to take game you mention easily.
With the available premium hunting loading commercially available for the 6.8 Western, I think it covers all the game you intend to hunt. The ballistics are way more than adequate for ranges you listed. Today's premium bullets from Barnes, Hammer, Maker, Nosler and Sierra to mention 5, allow you to use a 6.8 to take game you mention easily.
I am a .270 win fan and would choose a 6.8 western. Plenty of good bullets for handloading. Not as many high bc bullets as the 6.5prc but it only takes one good one to kill anything you want. More companies are designing high bc heavies for the 6.8 so I wouldn't worry there. I can't wait to try them out in my fast twist .270 win.
Ballistically, they are indistinguishable for practical purposes inside 900 yards. My 7mm Sherman Short mag and a friends twin has killed elk and deer at 1000-1100. If you want max distance, only then bullet weight matters.
But, shootability goes down as recoil goes up.
I shot 7mm SS for a couple years, and seeing what it did to deer at 700+ made me buy a 25 SST to make it even easier to shoot and drop a pound off my rifle. Using the 133 SST, I feel like I could go to a 110ish 6mm and kills stuff just as dead.
Terminal ballistics are indistinguishable among your choice if you use the same bullet, except the higher the bullet weight the bigger the carnage. But, the difference isn't massive and you won't be disappointed in a 6.5.
But, shootability goes down as recoil goes up.
I shot 7mm SS for a couple years, and seeing what it did to deer at 700+ made me buy a 25 SST to make it even easier to shoot and drop a pound off my rifle. Using the 133 SST, I feel like I could go to a 110ish 6mm and kills stuff just as dead.
Terminal ballistics are indistinguishable among your choice if you use the same bullet, except the higher the bullet weight the bigger the carnage. But, the difference isn't massive and you won't be disappointed in a 6.5.
H1000 is a bit too hot for me in my 7ss, fortunately I still have enough RL 26.
VV has a couple powders that work for 7 short mags.
I think you nailed it. 7 SAUM is the coolest of the three IMO but requires hand loading. 6.5 PRC fills this niche nicely. 6.8 Western is a little more unique but suffers from ammo availability relative to the 6.5 PRC and component availability relative to the 7 SAUM.
I have a lightweight 6.5 PRC for exactly this purpose and it would be my recommendation. IF I hand loaded, I'd own a 7 SAUM. Not that I think it's better, it's just cool as ****.
Yes stock choices being a little limited is the downside of medium. I have an ag composite ordered.
Ronald W Schaefer
Well-Known Member
Husker, very good comments. I have both 6.5 PRC (WT deer, Mule Deer, sheep and antelope, hogs) and 6.8 Western (moose, Elk and heavy plains game) and planning a 7 PRC soon...just because...prolly redundant to the 6.8 except for heavier bullets. Couple of additional comments, if you reload there is a new 150 gr, .264 NABLR bullet for teh 6.5 PRC with amazing BC/SD and with real slow powders runs almost as fast as the 140 gr versions--agree there is plenty of good factory ammo. That said, there are four factory cartridges (Win 162 gr, copper, 165 gr. NABLR, 170 gr, coated silver tip BT, and the browning 175 gr, Sierra TGK) available for the 6.8-- all shoot good in my Fierce 6.8 and all running ~2900 with crazy BC/SD--I'm calling OK for Elk and Moose at range and Kudu, Eland. My son is a wildlife biologist, wildlife manager and hunt guide on the Rancho Tres Hijos (hard to impress) and he has become really impressed with the 7 PRC--says it's gonna be his next rig. He says the terminal effects of that cartridge are the deadliest he's ever seen in fifteen years observing a hundred different vanilla to exotic cartridges. I would choose it over the 7SAUM just because of the factory support and boat load of ammo available.
I have a 7 Sherman max, the saum basically, and it's on a long action but the chamber was cut short. 2.85 is my max length when the Saum is 2.82. Limits my speed somewhat compared to some people's max but I'm in the process of turning my Winchester model 70 300 wsm into a regular 7saum and wouldn't hesitate on anything in Alaska. I've shot a mountain goat with mine and plan on using it for black and brown bears, moose and caribou next season.
