• If you are being asked to change your password, and unsure how to do it, follow these instructions. Click here

A Serious Question

The maximum range of 600 yards vs the animal's vital area are the defining factors for rifle precision. IMO, we would need better than 1 to 1.5 MOA (6" to 9" maximum group) to stay where we want to be at 600.

Regarding cartridges, a .308 will easily reach 600, but the exact range needs to be known, due to how quickly the .308 drops when it gets that far out. If one if using a rangefinder and can get a good measurement, fine. If not, a flatter shooting cartridge like one of the 6.5s would provide a higher hit percentage.,
 
The maximum range of 600 yards vs the animal's vital area are the defining factors for rifle precision. IMO, we would need better than 1 to 1.5 MOA (6" to 9" maximum group) to stay where we want to be at 600.

Regarding cartridges, a .308 will easily reach 600, but the exact range needs to be known, due to how quickly the .308 drops when it gets that far out. If one if using a rangefinder and can get a good measurement, fine. If not, a flatter shooting cartridge like one of the 6.5s would provide a higher hit percentage.,

Assuming that a range finder is used…..range known!

I wasn't really questioning the cartridge…..merely what should be the minimum accuracy qualifications for the rifle/shooter! memtb
 
If I am hunting to 600yd, I'm much more concerned with how the system performs at 600yd from prone and sitting.

In that context 100yd from the bench is meaningless.

Just my opinion 👍

I agree… but the equipments capabilities most be known. Or, in my mind it should be!

It would be rather pointless shooting from field positions at extended ranges…..if the rifle/cartridge/ load is only capable of 2" groups from the bench! memtb
 
You make me laugh. Are you thinking of changing your favorite rifle or just want to see opinions?
In a 9 lb rifle for me would hands down be a Winchester model 70 with claw extractor chambered in a either a 300 mag or 7 mm mag of some sort. Depends on game animals and where your hunting. If it were for dangerous game 375 h&h mag or something similar.
Me I don't like 9lb rifles I'm not saying I can't carry that weight of rifle I just don't see the point if a good ole 30-06 or 270 can kill out to my range of 500 yards why bother with a extra 3-4 lbs when I can carry other items like extra food or clothes, batteries. Just my thoughts.
 
For 600 yards I want a rifle to consistently hold 1 MOA or less. Even on a bad day. I do want to test that rifle out to that range to ensure it still holds that 1 MOA accuracy. 1 MOA puts you at around a 6 1/4" group at 600 yards. That falls within the kill zone needed for deer and large game and still leaves me a little wiggle room on my wind call and other factors. I also want that rifle to have either no cold bore POI shift or a consistent cold bore POI shift so that I can account for it. I took a 650yd shot with my .308 some time ago. That rifle shoots repeatedly shoots 1/2 MOA or less @ 100yds and has practically no cold bore POI shift. Had I not had a rifle with those capabilities, I wouldn't have taken the shot. I may be more picky than others but I absolutely despise wounding an animal and I want to remove any chance of doing so if possible. As for weight, I can't really comment. My main two hunting rifles weigh 12+ lbs.
 
You make me laugh. Are you thinking of changing your favorite rifle or just want to see opinions?
In a 9 lb rifle for me would hands down be a Winchester model 70 with claw extractor chambered in a either a 300 mag or 7 mm mag of some sort. Depends on game animals and where your hunting. If it were for dangerous game 375 h&h mag or something similar.
Me I don't like 9lb rifles I'm not saying I can't carry that weight of rifle I just don't see the point if a good ole 30-06 or 270 can kill out to my range of 500 yards why bother with a extra 3-4 lbs when I can carry other items like extra food or clothes, batteries. Just my thoughts.
Your 3006 is 5-6lbs wet?
 
You make me laugh. Are you thinking of changing your favorite rifle or just want to see opinions?
In a 9 lb rifle for me would hands down be a Winchester model 70 with claw extractor chambered in a either a 300 mag or 7 mm mag of some sort. Depends on game animals and where your hunting. If it were for dangerous game 375 h&h mag or something similar.
Me I don't like 9lb rifles I'm not saying I can't carry that weight of rifle I just don't see the point if a good ole 30-06 or 270 can kill out to my range of 500 yards why bother with a extra 3-4 lbs when I can carry other items like extra food or clothes, batteries. Just my thoughts.

Just wanting opinions pertaining to maximum group size expectations!

I gave 9 pounds, as that seemed to be a reasonable carry weight for most folks…..while also keeping it within a reasonable budget for the majority of hunters/shooters.

I've been saying, that under optimal conditions, I limit my distance to 600 yards. I wanted to know if my personal expectations were inflated or realistic! I may have to reevaluate! 😉

A survey of sorts, to see if I fall within the opinions of the much more experienced long (ish) range hunters! memtb
 
Last edited:
This is what Happens when people give
Smart... answers.
Then they start a thread.🤣🤣🤣🤣

If I think I will have a shot past 300yds, I want to be confident that my rifle will consistently shoot 1/2 moa to 600yds.
Out to 300yds 1moa will get it done.

Rifle = Only a 6/5 Creedmore.🤣🤣🤣🤣
Uhm 🤔 what size of game are you talking about would be my 1st question. A elks vital zone is much larger than say a pronghorn. If you can't get inside of 400 yards of a game animal then your just trying to prove your marksmanship not hunting skills. Sorry I know I'm on the wrong forum for common sense talk where everyone can hit a deers heart at 1600 yards and never worry about tracking skills.
 

Recent Posts

Top