Varmint Hunter
Well-Known Member
In my endless effort to find the perfect load I observed something interesting.
I loaded 9 rounds of several different loads to be tested. This would allow me to fire 3 - 3 shot groups of each load. I shot the groups in a round robin fashion.
First group of load #1 - then first group of load #2 - then first load of #3 and so on. Eventually I'd get back to load #1 again to retest that load. This would allow the groups to be fired under different bore conditions.
I fired 6 fouling loads the day before the tests began. Everything was chronographed with the Garmin.
The two things that I noticed were:
1. Velocity of each load continued to rise throughout the testing - not dramatically but noticeable
2. Fouling conditions definitely affected group size. Virtually all the loads shot the tightest groups on a relatively clean but fouled bore. Groups did open as the barrel accumulated more fouling.
FWIW - I was shooting a custom 6.5PRC with a 23.5" Bartlein carbon bbl.
I loaded 9 rounds of several different loads to be tested. This would allow me to fire 3 - 3 shot groups of each load. I shot the groups in a round robin fashion.
First group of load #1 - then first group of load #2 - then first load of #3 and so on. Eventually I'd get back to load #1 again to retest that load. This would allow the groups to be fired under different bore conditions.
I fired 6 fouling loads the day before the tests began. Everything was chronographed with the Garmin.
The two things that I noticed were:
1. Velocity of each load continued to rise throughout the testing - not dramatically but noticeable
2. Fouling conditions definitely affected group size. Virtually all the loads shot the tightest groups on a relatively clean but fouled bore. Groups did open as the barrel accumulated more fouling.
FWIW - I was shooting a custom 6.5PRC with a 23.5" Bartlein carbon bbl.