6.5 RPM what is it good for?

Zen Archery said:
What's any new cartridge good for?
+200-250 over the 65CM
+100-150 over the 65PRC
So if speed is your game (definitely a game Weatherby likes to play) then you have your answer.
Click to expand...
I think it also really finds its niche in weatherbys ultralight type rifles. It's a less "beefy" bolt and bolt face and receiver than the full size belted magnums
 
just_jon said:
If speed is your game, step on up to the 6.5-300 Wby. Mine drives the 156 Berger more than 500 fps faster than a 6.5 CM (3317 vs 2779 fps 26" barrel). Looking at QL, the 6.5 RPM will only get you to around 2950-3000 fps with the same bullet.
Click to expand...
Love my 6.5x300 bee too. Working up a load for Bergers 153.5 Hybrids and US869 and I am at 3250 with zero pressure. Gonna see where pressure is and drop back a grain. It's gonna be a hammer.
 
Horsemen61 said:
Hello all,

Let me start by saying I'm a 6.5 Junkie I love the .264 diameter bullets but I don't know anything about this cartridge so I'd love to learn about it
Click to expand...
Hey Horsemen61,

I don't have one, but I have a 6.5-300 Weatherby mag. But the idea of the 6.5 RPM was to maximize the 6 lug action that Weatherby produces for their standard length action. So they blew out a 284 and lengthened it to increase powder capacity and allow a magnum cartridge fit in their lights action and then developed the Backcountry rifle for it. Lightweight rifle that hits harder than most can usually get that light while remaining stock off the shelf.

It's faster than the PRC by 50-100 fps and is a cool rebated rim Weatherby cartridge. It's not as fast or overbore as the 26 Nosler or the big daddy 6.5-300 Wby though.
 
just_jon said:
If speed is your game, step on up to the 6.5-300 Wby. Mine drives the 156 Berger more than 500 fps faster than a 6.5 CM (3317 vs 2779 fps 26" barrel). Looking at QL, the 6.5 RPM will only get you to around 2950-3000 fps with the same bullet.
Click to expand...
Howdy Jon
What powder are you using for the 156's
3317 is boot scooting.
GO MOUNTAINEERS. 🤣
 
K.E.C. Darkside said:
Howdy Jon
What powder are you using for the 156's
3317 is boot scooting.
GO MOUNTAINEERS. 🤣
Click to expand...
Hey David. I used Ramshot LRT which I believe you had recommended when I bought the rifle from you. I tested from 84.5 to 86.5 in .5 grain increments and got 3172, 3168, 3213, 3258 and 3317. I was shocked at the velocity as QL estimated I would top out around 3170 which is about where I ended up with US869, N570 and RL33. Bolt lift was a tad stiff at 86.5, but brass showed no signs of excess pressure. Accuracy was sub-moa for a charge weights, I plan on backing off to 85.5 which shot under 1/4";@ 100.

Hope your Mountaineers are having a better afternoon that my Nittany Lions, They stunk up the 1st half at USC, but are mounting a comeback.

Jon
 
just_jon said:
Hey David. I used Ramshot LRT which I believe you had recommended when I bought the rifle from you. I tested from 84.5 to 86.5 in .5 grain increments and got 3172, 3168, 3213, 3258 and 3317. I was shocked at the velocity as QL estimated I would top out around 3170 which is about where I ended up with US869, N570 and RL33. Bolt lift was a tad stiff at 86.5, but brass showed no signs of excess pressure. Accuracy was sub-moa for a charge weights, I plan on backing off to 85.5 which shot under 1/4";@ 100.

Hope your Mountaineers are having a better afternoon that my Nittany Lions, They stunk up the 1st half at USC, but are mounting a comeback.

Jon
Click to expand...
But the Lions Win. WOW
Good for them.
 
just_jon said:
Hey David. I used Ramshot LRT which I believe you had recommended when I bought the rifle from you. I tested from 84.5 to 86.5 in .5 grain increments and got 3172, 3168, 3213, 3258 and 3317. I was shocked at the velocity as QL estimated I would top out around 3170 which is about where I ended up with US869, N570 and RL33. Bolt lift was a tad stiff at 86.5, but brass showed no signs of excess pressure. Accuracy was sub-moa for a charge weights, I plan on backing off to 85.5 which shot under 1/4";@ 100.

Hope your Mountaineers are having a better afternoon that my Nittany Lions, They stunk up the 1st half at USC, but are mounting a comeback.

Jon
Click to expand...
K.E.C. Darkside said:
But the Lions Win. WOW
Good for them.
Click to expand...

By any chance have either of you 6.5-300 shooters ever fiddled around with seeing how fast you can drive light for caliber bullets?
I know that's not what it's for, it's impractical to do, etc…but just thought I'd ask as I'm curious about this
 
Calvin45 said:
By any chance have either of you 6.5-300 shooters ever fiddled around with seeing how fast you can drive light for caliber bullets?
I know that's not what it's for, it's impractical to do, etc…but just thought I'd ask as I'm curious about this
Click to expand...
Jon better at that then I am.
I played with 124 H.H. with the 6.5/300
I would have to look in my notebook to tell you the speed. Thanks for inquiring. 👍
 
just_jon said:
Hey David. I used Ramshot LRT which I believe you had recommended when I bought the rifle from you. I tested from 84.5 to 86.5 in .5 grain increments and got 3172, 3168, 3213, 3258 and 3317. I was shocked at the velocity as QL estimated I would top out around 3170 which is about where I ended up with US869, N570 and RL33. Bolt lift was a tad stiff at 86.5, but brass showed no signs of excess pressure. Accuracy was sub-moa for a charge weights, I plan on backing off to 85.5 which shot under 1/4";@ 100.

Hope your Mountaineers are having a better afternoon that my Nittany Lions, They stunk up the 1st half at USC, but are mounting a comeback.

Jon
Click to expand...
Jon, seriously you topped out at 3170 with US869? I understand topping out with N570 as I did as well at 3150. Very disappointed to say the least.
But US869 has been the best powder I played with. My 153.5 BERGERS are past 3250 with zero pressure. As soon as it cools off to sub 50° I'll be back pushing forward to find pressure. I feel 3300-3350 should be very easy. Just shocked at you peaked at 3170 with US869.
Is your rifle a Weatherby or ? Just trying to figure how you topped out so low with US869.
 
Calvin45 said:
By any chance have either of you 6.5-300 shooters ever fiddled around with seeing how fast you can drive light for caliber bullets?
I know that's not what it's for, it's impractical to do, etc…but just thought I'd ask as I'm curious about this
Click to expand...
I've tested the 123AH and 124HH:

123AH
RL17: 71.0 gr @ 3580 fps. Hit pressure at 70.0 grains.
RL22: 78.0 gr @ 3507 fps. Hit pressure at 77.0 grains.
IMR 7828 SSC: 78.0 gr @ 3,385 fps. Never got to pressure.
H4350: 70.5 @ 3,457 fps. Hit pressure at 70.5 grains.

124HH
IMR 7828 SSC: 77.5 gr @ 3426 fps. Never got to pressure.
RL25: 80.0 gr @ 3381 fps. Never got to pressure.
N570: 81.0 gr @ 3573). Never got to pressure.

I have a bunch of 80HHT and 85HH that I plan on testing this fall. QL estimates RL16 can push the 85HH at 4240 fps. The 80HHT should do a bit better.
 

Similar threads

W
6.5 viking? what is it?
Replies
6
Views
4K
A42G
A
J
338 RUM at what long shots is it good for
Replies
11
Views
5K
jro45
J
Lahunter76
6.5 RPM
Replies
0
Views
668
Lahunter76
Lahunter76
A
6.5-284 good for it all?
3 4 5
Replies
59
Views
11K
maximini14
M
T
6.5x284 is it really this good
2
Replies
19
Views
6K
tjonh2001
T

Recent Posts

Top