grouse
Well-Known Member
What do you all think? Think Hornady will step out?
I'd expect a 7mm and a 6mm before a 33
I'd Like to see it just a necked down 300 PRC.what do you think they do with the 7? It sure is a crowded field. They nearly need to go small with it, under the 280-7RM, but then it sort of crowds their own offering, the 6.5 PRC. If they go middle, you have 280/AI/.284/7RM/7WSM. They can go large, not too much comp besides .28 Nosler, but not many sales in large mags, either.
Yorke-1's post and as caliber increases above .308, the number of shooters decrease, contribute to the discussion. IMHO, I don't anticipate a 338 PRC. The numbers in the .308 crowd didn't stop Hornady. The design of the PRC round is the game changer (even though there are some cool wildcats), the 33 Nosler is here, and a 7mm PRC discussion comes around frequently.Hornady has already looked into it; I have a reamer print dated 2008 for a 338 Hornday Match. It's essentially a 338/300 PRC. PTG sent me that print along with a few other versions of the 338/375 Ruger when I was working on that project around 10 years ago.
Ideally it would be between 7rm and 28 Nosler I would think. Thought they would have done it by now.what do you think they do with the 7? It sure is a crowded field. They nearly need to go small with it, under the 280-7RM, but then it sort of crowds their own offering, the 6.5 PRC. If they go middle, you have 280/AI/.284/7RM/7WSM. They can go large, not too much comp besides .28 Nosler, but not many sales in large mags, either.
What brass life do you get?I went with a straight 338/375 Ruger. I've had 5 barrels ranging from 18" to 28" over the years and I think it's a great chambering. I still have an 18" specialty pistol in 338/375 Ruger.
A 338 PRC would be a ballistic twin of the 330 Dakota or 33 Nosler.