VenatusDominus's latest activity
-
VenatusDominus reacted to elj1973's post in the thread Need a new LRF some advice please UPDATE SPOKE WITH SIG with
Like.
The glass is better than the Vortex, love the display. Menu navigation is easy and storage for 30 gun profiles. Wind function is nice... -
VenatusDominus reacted to Equalizer's post in the thread Seeking empirical evidence to support or refute powder/seating-depth nodes with Love.
Neat. We all got bug holes bro how many rounds did that take? It's been stated over and over but I'll make it stark for those who don’t...
-
VenatusDominus reacted to elj1973's post in the thread Need a new LRF some advice please UPDATE SPOKE WITH SIG with Like.
Thats why I just got a pair of the 10k gen 2's. Now. 3 years ago got a set of the Furry hd AB's cause of Sigs old warranty not covering...
-
VenatusDominus reacted to Beluebow's post in the thread Seeking empirical evidence to support or refute powder/seating-depth nodes with Love.
I shot this seating depth test two days ago because of this thread. I screwed this 300wsm barrel on and used ammo from another gun that...
-
VenatusDominus reacted to biednick's post in the thread Seeking empirical evidence to support or refute powder/seating-depth nodes with Love.
I'm probably going to regret wading into this dumpster fire, but the short answer is it doesn't exist. There's no good evidence seating...
-
VenatusDominus replied to the thread Need a new LRF some advice please UPDATE SPOKE WITH SIG.Three years ago I spent months agonizing over whether to by the Vortex Fury HD5000 AB or Sig Kilo 5K. In the end I went with the Vortex...
-
VenatusDominus reacted to Equalizer's post in the thread Seeking empirical evidence to support or refute powder/seating-depth nodes with Like.
I believe you sir and the only reason I quoted your post was that you summarized his goal. I was referring to the less than cordial...
-
VenatusDominus reacted to Csafisher's post in the thread Seeking empirical evidence to support or refute powder/seating-depth nodes with Haha.
The joke is thinking that old reloading techniques work better for old guns….. 😂
-
VenatusDominus reacted to RichCoyle's post in the thread Seeking empirical evidence to support or refute powder/seating-depth nodes with Love.
Equalizer, I meant animosity towards the OP. I practice what he preaches.
-
VenatusDominus reacted to sjt18's post in the thread Seeking empirical evidence to support or refute powder/seating-depth nodes with Love.
Science never answers "why" questions. I think the word you might want to use is "how". It works... so "how" does it work.... or maybe...
-
VenatusDominus reacted to Equalizer's post in the thread Seeking empirical evidence to support or refute powder/seating-depth nodes with Love.
This is the actual point of everything this guy has posted and asked about but for some reason nobody gets it. He’s trying to find out...
-
VenatusDominus reacted to cajun's post in the thread Seeking empirical evidence to support or refute powder/seating-depth nodes with Like.
So one guy posted a video that he found no difference in accuracy with seating depth changes. So the reality of statistics is that is...
-
VenatusDominus reacted to sjt18's post in the thread Seeking empirical evidence to support or refute powder/seating-depth nodes with Like.
Don't look now but I think your last paragraph amounts to a valid method. I may have missed it but did not notice the OP specifying an...
-
VenatusDominus reacted to sjt18's post in the thread Seeking empirical evidence to support or refute powder/seating-depth nodes with Like.
Looks like you are catching some grief from some. I'm newer to this than you. Unfortunately I have wasted quite a few bullets and some...
-
VenatusDominus reacted to Horse1's post in the thread Seeking empirical evidence to support or refute powder/seating-depth nodes with Like.
I do. 75gn A-max's from 1:8 22-250's are into the lands in my rifles, as are 140gn TSX's from 270Win.