VenatusDominus's latest activity
-
VenatusDominus reacted to lancetkenyon's post in the thread Seeking empirical evidence to support or refute powder/seating-depth nodes with
Like.
Comparing me to a Harris voter? Man, we better not ever cross paths! Them's fightin' words. 🤣 -
VenatusDominus reacted to Csafisher's post in the thread Seeking empirical evidence to support or refute powder/seating-depth nodes with Love.
Arguing with old school reloaders is like arguing with Harris voters…. Waste of time. It’s not tricks. It’s knowing what is worth your time.
-
VenatusDominus reacted to Huntnful's post in the thread “Your groups are too small” vs barrel life with Love.
This is what peaks my interest. I've heard several benchrest, F class, and also PRS guy (although they aren't as precise) say they've...
-
VenatusDominus reacted to Huntnful's post in the thread “Your groups are too small” vs barrel life with Like.
Hahaha she's built for speed, not comfort 🤣🤣 But that ain't a bad 12 shot group…
-
VenatusDominus reacted to Mike6158's post in the thread Seeking empirical evidence to support or refute powder/seating-depth nodes with Love.
I guess the point was that the loads worked on that day. The F Class guy (Erik Cortina, he's on YT) that shot an under a 3" group (I...
-
VenatusDominus reacted to Csafisher's post in the thread Seeking empirical evidence to support or refute powder/seating-depth nodes with Like.
You might want to check out reloading all day on discord. The folks there are a lot more open to the theory’s posted here. Many people...
-
VenatusDominus reacted to Phil Rizzo's post in the thread Seeking empirical evidence to support or refute powder/seating-depth nodes with Like.
I need some Excedrin hahahahah. Actually I admire your passion for learning, with guidelines. Keep asking so I can gather some more. My...
-
VenatusDominus replied to the thread Seeking empirical evidence to support or refute powder/seating-depth nodes.Thanks for the advice, I will have to check it out.
-
VenatusDominus replied to the thread Seeking empirical evidence to support or refute powder/seating-depth nodes.Nice shooting, looks like what you are doing works. I am envious of the subsonic .308 load (assume you run a can). I live in the...
-
VenatusDominus reacted to Mike6158's post in the thread Seeking empirical evidence to support or refute powder/seating-depth nodes with Like.
I've been testing two new rifles. Neither are special. In fact I'd call them sub par for the brand. The first is a Ruger American Gen II...
-
VenatusDominus replied to the thread Seeking empirical evidence to support or refute powder/seating-depth nodes.That is a group to brag about for sure, nice shooting!!!
-
VenatusDominus reacted to ShtrRdy's post in the thread Seeking empirical evidence to support or refute powder/seating-depth nodes with Love.
The following is an example of the method used in the video link I posted in post #30. On one of the YouTube channels I follow...
-
VenatusDominus replied to the thread Seeking empirical evidence to support or refute powder/seating-depth nodes.I have been using the OCW test since discovering it in 2022 and I have loaded accurate ammo with it. To be honest I would probably not...
-
VenatusDominus replied to the thread Seeking empirical evidence to support or refute powder/seating-depth nodes.I believed that seating depth had an effect on barrel harmonic. It just makes sense and I can wrap my brain around it. But recent data...
-
VenatusDominus reacted to Muledeerhuntingfreak's post in the thread Seeking empirical evidence to support or refute powder/seating-depth nodes with Like.
I just can't believe people can't read between the lines I did amazing he's just trying to get more information