Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Reverse Engineering a ballistic program.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jeff In TX" data-source="post: 159576" data-attributes="member: 1522"><p>[ QUOTE ]</p><p>Jeff,</p><p></p><p>****! I had an inkling that you were going to say what you said. Jeeze, more work for me. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/frown.gif</p><p></p><p>Regarding scope height. I'm all comfy as I'm carrying the numbers out 3 places /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif but after ready you post I'm wondering if I'm using the right numbers.</p><p></p><p>What's a better method of determining the correct number especially if using the plastic burris inserts to get a few more MOA?</p><p></p><p>Great post. </p><p></p><p>[/ QUOTE ]</p><p></p><p>When it comes to scope height and tapered bases it's a crap shoot on what number to use. I found out the actual measured number was the problem. But when I started to make changes, everything fell into place. Afterwards I figured it was the angle/tapered bases screwing up my results. </p><p></p><p>Ballistic programs work on basis of the scope base being parallel to the bore. I would have never guessed it, but it made a huge difference. Trial and error is my best advice!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jeff In TX, post: 159576, member: 1522"] [ QUOTE ] Jeff, ****! I had an inkling that you were going to say what you said. Jeeze, more work for me. [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] Regarding scope height. I'm all comfy as I'm carrying the numbers out 3 places [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] but after ready you post I'm wondering if I'm using the right numbers. What's a better method of determining the correct number especially if using the plastic burris inserts to get a few more MOA? Great post. [/ QUOTE ] When it comes to scope height and tapered bases it's a crap shoot on what number to use. I found out the actual measured number was the problem. But when I started to make changes, everything fell into place. Afterwards I figured it was the angle/tapered bases screwing up my results. Ballistic programs work on basis of the scope base being parallel to the bore. I would have never guessed it, but it made a huge difference. Trial and error is my best advice! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Reverse Engineering a ballistic program.
Top