Wondering if anyone has seen or used this reticle in a Ziess? Thinking about getting one in a 4.5 x 14 by 50 in the RR 800. My main concern is how thick the reticle is, in the pic it looks very thin almost to thin.
Might also be an idea to check the click values, Ziess Germany are 1 cm per click. Might be a bit coarse for what you had in mind. Conquest models are assembled for the US market only, I think by Meopta. Rapid is limited to Conquest at present, despite asking we cannot get any response from Ziess GB as to when and if we might see Rapid in Europe.
Note: Please enter your information into our Rapid-Z Calculator to ensure that you make the best possible reticle selection based on your caliber, bullet, hunting conditions and location.
According to their calculator for the Rapid Z 1000 (designed for the .308 Match bullets): This IS the value for .308, Sierra 168-gr. MK (BC =.462), Velocity: 2,550 fps, Elevation: 4,500 ft. ASL Temp: 80 degrees F
The Rapid Z 1000 With their calculator, and the scope power ring set to 11.87 (12 power): They say to zero dead-on at 500 yards with the Bar 5. At Bar 1 will impact at 154 yards (or zero at 154 yards with Bar 1). Bar 2 = 224 Bar 3 = 316 Bar 4 = 406 Bar 5 = 500 Bar 6 = 595 Bar 7 = 692 Bar 8 = 791 Bar 9 = 892 Bar 10 = 993 This is seemingly unbeatable.
Now, with the Rapid Z 800: With the M1A, same load, they say to put the power ring at 14 power. Sight in at 1.77" high @ 100 yards for a 200 yard zero (Crosshairs). Bar 2 will impact at 295 yards (unmarked bar) Bar 4 = 395 Bar 5 = 495 Bar 6 = 596 Bar 7 = 698 Bar 8 = 800
I know it's not 1,000 - but rather versatile anyway...
So, I'm deciding on which to choose. More field of view at 12 power with the Z 1000, than 14x on the Z 800. And the Z 800 is intended for other calibers, but, look at what I found for the .308!
Note: Please enter your information into our Rapid-Z Calculator to ensure that you make the best possible reticle selection based on your caliber, bullet, hunting conditions and location.
According to their calculator for the Rapid Z 1000 (designed for the .308 Match bullets): This IS the value for .308, Sierra 168-gr. MK (BC =.462), Velocity: 2,550 fps, Elevation: 4,500 ft. ASL Temp: 80 degrees F
The Rapid Z 1000 With their calculator, and the scope power ring set to 11.87 (12 power): They say to zero dead-on at 500 yards with the Bar 5. (Bar 5 is the center crosshair.) At Bar 1 will impact at 154 yards (or zero at 154 yards with Bar 1). Bar 2 = 224 (Bars 1 - 4 are above the center crosshair Bar 5.) Bar 3 = 316 Bar 4 = 406 Bar 5 = 500 Bar 6 = 595 Bar 7 = 692 Bar 8 = 791 Bar 9 = 892 Bar 10 = 993 This is seemingly unbeatable.
Now, with the Rapid Z 800: With the M1A, same load, they say to put the power ring at 14 power. Sight in at 1.77" high @ 100 yards for a 200 yard zero (Center Crosshairs). Bar 2 will impact at 295 yards (an unmarked bar). (All Bars are below the center crosshairs.) Bar 4 = 395 Bar 5 = 495 Bar 6 = 596 Bar 7 = 698 Bar 8 = 800
I know it's not 1,000 - but rather versatile anyway...
So, I'm deciding on which to choose. More field of view at 12 power with the Z 1000, than 14x on the Z 800. And the Z 800 is intended for other calibers, but, look at what I found for the .308!
lightbulb But, if you definitely need it backed-off at the lowest 4.5 power also, then the Z 800 will work for both close-quarter work and long-range. (What would the Z 1000 do at 4.5 power? - when it is set up for range at 12 power?)