Don't forget the Edsel syndrome. Ask people what they desire, if price were no object, and you get a slanted response. Lapua prices are ridiculous and they have a very limited product line.
Don't believe all the hype about Lapua and Norma, it's just another brand at three times the price. I think some people are kidding themselves into thinking that their groups are 3X better, or that they can expect to get thirty reloads per case, instead of ten.
Yeah, I sometimes use Lapua, and have used Norma, in the past, when it was priced the same as US brands. Now, I can't see where Norma is superior just because the Internet Gurus claim that it is?
I have used WW and RP for close to 40 years and have seen very few instances of poor quality brass. Especially for the casual handloader in a hunting application, this brand snobbery is a little bogus.
The thing that has changed is that at one time, it was easier to buy cases by the box of 20 cases, complete with printed lot numbers on the end flap. Now, buying from Midway, etc. you are buying bulk and cannot determine the assumed consistancy in a box of 100 cases. So, you must buy twice as many as you need and forced to cull this brass by whatever method you deem best?
In this respect, Lapua is (admittedly) ahead of the curve, because boxes of 100 do have a lot number. But, really, for a hunting application, it is a reach to pin a missed animal on inconsistancy in your cases. For the most part, I think the quality of your brass is one of several components; bullets, primers, and powder, and the results measured in thousanths with a dial calipers. Which one is more important? Do we need to hunt with "Match" bullets? "Match" primers, and "Match" brass?
Yeah, I do all that stuff, but when you think about it, considering the human factor, it can get a little silly.
Good hunting. LB