I read a lot on the 243ai and the 25/06ai in this thread. my question is are these better than say the 240 weatherby or the 257 weatherby. using the same bullets in each caliber like the 100 grn in the 24 cal. and the 110 in the 25 cal.
Better, is a relative term and as such, fairly unreliable as a discussion term and/or decision maker. As posted by others, Efficiency, brass life, bore life etc as defined discussion topics are far more useful to make an educated decision.
I'm a fairly big 6mm fan, owning at least 3 right now. Of the two, i'm afraid the 6mm, from an external ballistics perspective would be my hands down choice. When/if a heavier, higher BC .257 comes out, the vote could very easily swing the other way; we're just not there yet.
My first wildcat chamber was the .243AI. What a great little round, especially now that Lapua brass is available. You could use Lapua in the 25-06 as it's parent case, the 30-06 is made by Lapua however, there will be quite a bit of work involved.
You will find, as most experienced reloaders have; the design of the AI cases have a tendency to mask pressure until you're well over the threshold. You will also find that the 40* shoulder will limit brass growth, mitigating the amount of trimming needed. You may also find that the AI's can promote difficult feeding from a factory mag box, a little elbow grease can/should fix that.
I've since burned out my original 243Ai barrel & moved on to the 6mmAI, which I believe offers even more "bang for the buck" than the little winny. The caveat being, you get Rem brass or you get Rem brass
.
As Mud said, your local 'smith should have no difficulty opening your factory chamber to the AI. They should also warn you that it is not guaranteed & "accidents" do happen while chambering.
t