That's a statement that's way to broad with out some comparison .is this just an opinion or conjecture or do you have experience with any of the cartridges similar to this .please fill us in on you experience and qualifications to make that statement. improved cheytac holds similar powder amounts how many of those are out there ? 416 Barrett, 30 + gr powder same case but properly sized smaller .I'm not sure what that even means are you saying that compared to a 30-06 it will be harder on barrels or you saying compare to any of the new nozzlers or PPC ,WSM how about the 33XC ( tubs ) if you look at the calaber and powder capacity (150/160) along with the effortless 3250 on 350gr 361 gr bullet velocity I don't see much difference than any new cartridge being developed today but to run it at say 3500 sure it will be hard on barrels . I'm glad you responded and would like to hear more of you thoughts . And maybe a definition of barrel life on any of the above cartridges .would help with a quess at what will really will happen this is a new cartridge. Designed with a proven formula and based on existing cartridges but in a new size leangh and caliber thanks again let's keep the discussion going
First off theres nothing wrong with wildcatting and pushing the limits I'm glad you're having fun with it.
I am only passing on my experience not assumptions or hearsay, they may be comparatively close in reason to make the statement I did.
Ive been working around the 375s since 2016 we started out with a case fire-formed was a 585 African - case head size in comparison would be equal steps in diameter as a 338LM to a 375 Cheytac to the 585 African case in which was necked down to a 375 - this was called a 375VM2 the 375VM2 had a few problems with the case wall being to straight but also the brass was to thick in the case head sidewall area and would not bounce back causing secondary extraction issues on fire-formed Bertram brass - new brass worked great.
so the 375VM2 project costed a bunch of money on a rifle that was supposed to be a butt kicker but failed.
So while the 375VM2 was being converted back down to a Cheytac bolt face we built multiple 375 Snipetacs that are doing well to this day within our group.
After the 375VM2 project got scraped back in 2017 we had a shortened up 50 cal necked down to a 375 built. Comparable to a 416 Barrett within 25 grains +
Excellent speeds from the 361s - 3250 - 3450 fps very easy. It was a laser and a tack driver. On the first barrel it made it through load development and testing on the 361s and 400s even the 400s were crazy fast and accurate while testing we were using H50BMG powder and the throat was eroding fairly fast. a second barrel had to go on the rifle in order to attend a ELR match in 2018 and we switched powders to a less abrasive powder in order to save the throat. This barrel made 10 rounds for breakin, another 10 in Colorado and 32 rounds in New Mexico - 52 rounds total with 30 of them used at a event shooting fairly fast under the timer-clock and 138 thou of throat erosion.
I know that Sullivan had a similar experience with his 375/50 wildcat as well as Garrett on his 375/50 setup.
If a feller wanted to shoot off a bench or prone and can pace himself and not heat things up you will have a tack driving lighting bolt - they are fun for sure but I know of a bunch of us that have to shoot multiple rounds while a timer is ticking away that the 375/50s just were tough on throats.
so 52 rounds = 138 thou of throat erosion the challenge is staying in a accuracy node and thats why a bunch of us went a different route.
I told folks its like taking a cutting torch and heating up the lead and throat of the barrel and hitting it with a sand blaster at the same time because you have all the heat coming out of the big case and into a small hole with powder flowing through as well as its burning.
So here again 1000s of dollars spent, that gets painful but thats pushing the limits and wildcatting for the best mouse trap. The saying is barrels are like tires on a Nitros dragster.
The cure to this was opening all the brass up to a 416 and chambering a barrel in the 416 - now we have enough area for flow and the throat is eroding like a normal barrel should, actually very good.
Maybe yours won't see this I sure hope you succeed, I hope this explains my reply.
Jeff Heeg
osoh