Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
What is the MOST FUSSY cartridge...and LEAST?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TR1Hemi" data-source="post: 2967281" data-attributes="member: 122752"><p>Been an interesting read, noticed the 224 Val mentioned a few times, I dont have one, but it kind of surprises me.</p><p></p><p>Fussiest other than anything Slug, Muzzle loader, or Rimfire, has actually been a poorly chambered custom/aftermarket. One was a 6 x 6.8 chambered cockeyed. The other was a Stoner 308 AR10 that the throat looked like it had been cut by a beaver. Apparently lube or cleaning chips is not required at Stoner. It was an $80 barrel on sale at Midway, I was embarrassed for them. Tell me they did not know they had issues.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TR1Hemi, post: 2967281, member: 122752"] Been an interesting read, noticed the 224 Val mentioned a few times, I dont have one, but it kind of surprises me. Fussiest other than anything Slug, Muzzle loader, or Rimfire, has actually been a poorly chambered custom/aftermarket. One was a 6 x 6.8 chambered cockeyed. The other was a Stoner 308 AR10 that the throat looked like it had been cut by a beaver. Apparently lube or cleaning chips is not required at Stoner. It was an $80 barrel on sale at Midway, I was embarrassed for them. Tell me they did not know they had issues. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
What is the MOST FUSSY cartridge...and LEAST?
Top