mustardtiger56
Active Member
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2014
- Messages
- 25
So after researching various optics for a lightweight .270 build (that will be used as my primary hunting rifle) capable of reaching out to a max of about 500 yards, I settled on the Vortex viper HS 2.5-10x44. While I was adding it to my cart (online shopping) I noticed a deal on a 3-9x40 viper for $299 as opposed to $599 for the HS (I live in Canada). So, after some brief research, I found a forum discussing the differences between the two scopes and guys were saying the glass quality is identical, and the only real differences were the tube size and the fact that the HS was essentially a tactical scope sized down to a hunting scope, and that the weight saving for the original viper made it more suitable for a hunting gun. So with that, I purchased the viper 3-9x40 instead. Today however, I was browsing a forum and someone mentioned that the Viper HS glass is superior to the original viper and the the Diamondback HP is essentially on par with the original viper with more features. Now I'm feeling like I made the wrong decision, I thought I had scored an excellent deal on a higher end, premium rifle scope well suited for a lifetime of abuse that was of enough quality to earn a spot on a do-it-all, mountain capable rifle. Now I'm beginning to wonder if the HS was the scope that filled my criteria and the original Viper is really just a glorified Diamondback HP, more suited on a budget or plinking rifle, not so much a rifle that will need to withstand abuse in the backcountry. What do you guys think? Did I make the right choice in going with the original Viper for half the price of the HS? Even if glass is similar, is the Diamondback HP on par overall with the original Viper? is it the premium scope it's often touted as, or more of a budget option?
I know I've asked a lot here, but I'm very interested in what you guys think.
Thanks
I know I've asked a lot here, but I'm very interested in what you guys think.
Thanks