Using 2506 Al to make a 25 280 AI

won't be a problem the base to body/shoulder measurement on 2506ai 2.065 and 280 ai 2.0923 dia. @ .200 line 2506ai. .4708 and 280ai. .471
running the reamer deeper by .027 won't hurt a thing
 
Personally, I don't think you'd gain anything much at all. The 25-06AI is about .005 larger in the body at the body/shoulder junction and the 280AI is about .035 longer in the body length. It will probably be pretty much a wash performance wise. Then there is a die, reamer and gauge expense. I'd just go with the 25-06AI and save myself some headaches.
 
both cases are .455 at shoulder. the real advantage is necking down 280ai brass, changing bushings in 280ai dies really simplify the process and keep expense to a minimal considering you won't have to fireform brass just to get started on your load development.
 

both cases are .455 at shoulder. the real advantage is necking down 280ai brass, changing bushings in 280ai dies really simplify the process and keep expense to a minimal considering you won't have to fireform brass just to get started on your load development.
I was going by Sierra infinity drawing. Maybe there is an error. Yep, just checked SAAMI. 280AI is .4541 at the shoulder.
In that case, I'd probably opt for a new reamer because of the case length so eventually when someone else ends up with the rifle, they won't have a catastrophe.
 

Attachments

  • 25-06AI.gif
    25-06AI.gif
    2 KB · Views: 48
  • 280REMAI.gif
    280REMAI.gif
    3.2 KB · Views: 49
Last edited:

Recent Posts

Top