Even if the biologist gets back to you, I doubt he'd be able to fill in your blanks with any degree of confidence. He won't have an estimate for the number of deer in that unit. He might be able to say whether deer numbers are increasing, decreasing, or stable. But even then, the margins of error are such that year to year comparisons are dubious. It probably will show longer term trends.
Any figures they have for fawn survival are probably based on work done by Colorado State University. Might be recent or decades old. Probably was done at one or 2 sites in the state that may or may not be near where you'll be hunting.
With respect to CWD, yeah, it's there. Don't know if Colorado tests annually or not. Personally, I don't see the point of it. Why spend money on testing to tell you what you already know. It's there. Testing protocol to determine if it's increasing/decreasing/spreading/shrinking will be different that testing just to determine if it's there or not. If they've tested in the past, they should be able to tell you what the prevalance rate was. Wear gloves, don't eat the brain or spinal cord, and don't worry about it.
They probably have some broad estimates of buck/doe ratios, but this can vary locally. For instance, are you hunting public land where hunters have the option of harvesting antlerless deer? Or are you on a private lease where the lessees are managing for big bucks?
That's just my take on the matter. Could be wrong. I don't know anything about Colorado Division of Wildlife; but, I work as a biologist in another state.