• If you are being asked to change your password, and unsure how to do it, follow these instructions. Click here

Tungsten Core Rifle Bullets

I tried the old MRX years ago and the BC wasn't any better to an appreciable degree. The other interesting thing was that out of my 300RUM they wouldn't penetrate the same steel plate has a Hornady BTSP 190 would. I would have thought it would be the other way around. It was a looong time ago and I don't remember the specifics of the steel plate, BC numbers or load specs but it was 180 MRX versus the Hornady 190
 
I tried the old MRX years ago and the BC wasn't any better to an appreciable degree. The other interesting thing was that out of my 300RUM they wouldn't penetrate the same steel plate has a Hornady BTSP 190 would. I would have thought it would be the other way around. It was a looong time ago and I don't remember the specifics of the steel plate, BC numbers or load specs but it was 180 MRX versus the Hornady 190
That's weird for sure!
 
I tried the old MRX years ago and the BC wasn't any better to an appreciable degree. The other interesting thing was that out of my 300RUM they wouldn't penetrate the same steel plate has a Hornady BTSP 190 would. I would have thought it would be the other way around. It was a looong time ago and I don't remember the specifics of the steel plate, BC numbers or load specs but it was 180 MRX versus the Hornady 190
Wow your Hornady BTSP 190 bullets that you load penetrate steel plates? See where you don't know what the steel plates were - most are AR 500 and 3/8" 1/2"thickness
 

Attachments

  • HPIM0919.JPG
    HPIM0919.JPG
    57.9 KB · Views: 107
  • HPIM0925.JPG
    HPIM0925.JPG
    743.4 KB · Views: 114
  • HPIM0928.JPG
    HPIM0928.JPG
    44.1 KB · Views: 98
The only thing I can figure is the nose or meplat of the 190 BTSP was smaller thus the other two. More energy on a smaller surface area.
 
The only thing I can figure is the nose or meplat of the 190 BTSP was smaller thus the other two. More energy on a smaller surface area.
Personally, I am not sure. My guess is that the specific gravity of the jacketed lead 190 was higher than the 180 MRX since the majority of the MRX was copper with some plastic in addition to a small tungsten rear core.
 
Personally, I am not sure. My guess is that the specific gravity of the jacketed lead 190 was higher than the 180 MRX since the majority of the MRX was copper with some plastic in addition to a small tungsten rear core.
I wouldn't think so since tungsten is more dense than lead. Hard telling not knowing.
 
I wouldn't think so since tungsten is more dense than lead. Hard telling not knowing.
It is. Except there wasn't that much of it in the bullet. It likely would not have had as high of a specific gravity than the Hornady. 90% of the MRX was copper which is considerably lower than jacketed lead. The smaller percentage of tungsten would not have made a bullet that is normally 8.89 equal the 10.7 jacketed lead has.
 
Top