Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
The PRC die "problem"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BrentM" data-source="post: 2697190" data-attributes="member: 61747"><p>Yeah both of those guys are making money and both have their marketing plan. I don't see the logic necessarily in the over work. Both reduce the brass size the same amount in the end. You either expand to 532 or 533 and work the brass back .002. I'm not buying off on the claim it overworks yet. I have more concern you are blowing the base out more than the thicker web creating a stretch, but I have no facts to be overly concerned. Time is the telling tale of all this. I have 9 reloads on the adg using whidden, I have 2 reloads on lapau using whidden. I have 10 reloads on hornady using a standard Die. Not enough data or time for me to be convinced which is better. If I had known a reamer was going to be designed I would have just went the reamer route. As things worked out, I have both now. Not many people, if any, have both and barrels I can play with. However, I know what I'm currently doing works as it should and I don't make any money off the process. Heck before all this I modified a 300 prc die and cut .25" off the bottom to get the same result. I really don't care what others decided to do with their money and time, I'm just giving examples of options of things that clearly work.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BrentM, post: 2697190, member: 61747"] Yeah both of those guys are making money and both have their marketing plan. I don’t see the logic necessarily in the over work. Both reduce the brass size the same amount in the end. You either expand to 532 or 533 and work the brass back .002. I’m not buying off on the claim it overworks yet. I have more concern you are blowing the base out more than the thicker web creating a stretch, but I have no facts to be overly concerned. Time is the telling tale of all this. I have 9 reloads on the adg using whidden, I have 2 reloads on lapau using whidden. I have 10 reloads on hornady using a standard Die. Not enough data or time for me to be convinced which is better. If I had known a reamer was going to be designed I would have just went the reamer route. As things worked out, I have both now. Not many people, if any, have both and barrels I can play with. However, I know what I’m currently doing works as it should and I don’t make any money off the process. Heck before all this I modified a 300 prc die and cut .25” off the bottom to get the same result. I really don’t care what others decided to do with their money and time, I’m just giving examples of options of things that clearly work. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
The PRC die "problem"
Top