WildRose
Well-Known Member
When I was still in the service we toyed a bit with a similar "super 300" from Norma and it got good reviews from those of us who used it but it just never took off.
A few years later comes the .300 Laupua Magnum which took a back seat to it's big brother the .338LM.
A couple of years ago when Norma announced the new, standardized version of the .300NM I got interested and have from time to time made it a point to keep up with it's development and reports from those using it.
I need a new caliber like I need a hole in the head but that doesn't keep me from looking. Admittedly having 3 ea .300wm's and .300 Rum's I've got the 30's covered pretty darned well but I just have to keep going back and looking at it again for obvious reasons. It lays between the 300wm and 300Rum but almost approximates Rum ballistics without the barrel wear.
I also talk frequently about spin and the fact it's a function of MV which is determined by barrel length and twist rate.
I came across this article in which the author talks about using shorter barrels with faster twists to end up with actually faster spin which gives gyroscopic stability greater into the subsonic range using VLD type bullets vs longer barrels with slower twist rates.
Anyhow it seems like a good read so I thought I'd share it here since from time to time I've seen a lot of interest in the .300NM.
Norma hasn't made a big splash for quite a few years but when I was younger they were one of the go to sources for extremely accurate factory ammo with great brass and good load data.
You can find it here.
http://www.accuracy1stdg.com/content/docs/binder7.pdf
A few years later comes the .300 Laupua Magnum which took a back seat to it's big brother the .338LM.
A couple of years ago when Norma announced the new, standardized version of the .300NM I got interested and have from time to time made it a point to keep up with it's development and reports from those using it.
I need a new caliber like I need a hole in the head but that doesn't keep me from looking. Admittedly having 3 ea .300wm's and .300 Rum's I've got the 30's covered pretty darned well but I just have to keep going back and looking at it again for obvious reasons. It lays between the 300wm and 300Rum but almost approximates Rum ballistics without the barrel wear.
I also talk frequently about spin and the fact it's a function of MV which is determined by barrel length and twist rate.
I came across this article in which the author talks about using shorter barrels with faster twists to end up with actually faster spin which gives gyroscopic stability greater into the subsonic range using VLD type bullets vs longer barrels with slower twist rates.
Anyhow it seems like a good read so I thought I'd share it here since from time to time I've seen a lot of interest in the .300NM.
Norma hasn't made a big splash for quite a few years but when I was younger they were one of the go to sources for extremely accurate factory ammo with great brass and good load data.
You can find it here.
http://www.accuracy1stdg.com/content/docs/binder7.pdf