I'm not clear as to how you conducted your comparisons. You used 3 different rifles, 3 different people loading ammo @ 3 different locations w/different equiptment, and shot over 2 different chronographs.
That's enough variables to account for all kinds of results.
I had an occasion to shoot the same load, from the same rifle, on the same day, through 2 different chronographs. The results were a consistent 100 ft/sec different. The Chrony always gave readings of 100 ft/sec faster than my Oehler 35P even when I put the Chrony directly behind the Oehler and fired a single bullet over both chronographs. This was on a mid-summer day with temperatures @ 70-80 degrees.
I was concerned enough about this discrepency to ship my Oehler 35 and the screens back to the company to verify the instruments accuracy. Oehler stated that it would be "nearly" impossible for the Oehler to be off that much because it has 3 screens and 2 clocks by which it verifies the velocity. They tested the unit anyway and determined that it was very accurate, consistent, and well within their tolerances.
I can only assume that the Chrony was consistently inaccurate and the data derived while using that chronograph would be highly unreliable. However, it belongs to my buddy who continues to use it and relies on its output.