Mikecr
Well-Known Member
idefendem, RUNOUT and perceived CONCENTRICITY are two different things.
And the Hornady neck bender is not a valid solution for either.
I don't understand all the implications that fireforming would create runout.
Fireforming is the ONLY way to straighten cases, and it works very well.
Take a new case, measure it's runout off necks. Now load it, fire it, remeasure -runout reduced.
FL size it, remeasure -runout returns.
Repeat this cycle -runout grows.
Now you can index/mark the case to see a bow develops in this, and yes it follows thickness variance.
This is why neck bending is in no way a solution. It doesn't straighten a case that will be rechambered.
Solution:
#1 Cull by thickness variance
#2 Size minimally
#3 Determine & manage additions to loaded runout
And the Hornady neck bender is not a valid solution for either.
I don't understand all the implications that fireforming would create runout.
Fireforming is the ONLY way to straighten cases, and it works very well.
Take a new case, measure it's runout off necks. Now load it, fire it, remeasure -runout reduced.
FL size it, remeasure -runout returns.
Repeat this cycle -runout grows.
Now you can index/mark the case to see a bow develops in this, and yes it follows thickness variance.
This is why neck bending is in no way a solution. It doesn't straighten a case that will be rechambered.
Solution:
#1 Cull by thickness variance
#2 Size minimally
#3 Determine & manage additions to loaded runout