Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
Ron Paul
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pdvdh" data-source="post: 210978" data-attributes="member: 4191"><p>Edge,</p><p></p><p>You'll have to find someone to fight with other than me. Some people can discuss politics without getting their panties in a wad, and some can't. </p><p></p><p>You don't know what you get and don't get about me. And you can't know what you don't know, which is who I hate or don't hate, or what I think about Bush, or Clinton, or anyone else. Cripes. Talk about wrapped around the axle. In my first interaction with you on this forum it's pretty clear that politics discussions are a waste of time with you. Your aggresive post won't win over many converts to your political position. </p><p></p><p>Be FOR something. Exactly what are you implying. Something positive about me? That I'm an intelligent person? An independent thinker who isn't swayed by other's antics or manipulation? I guess that's what you meant. Makes me feel warm and fuzzy. FOR typed in capital letters... is that supposed to impress me or others? </p><p></p><p>I'm comfortable with my prior post. Wouldn't change a thing.</p><p></p><p>To everyone other than Edge I post this:</p><p></p><p>With respect to the presidential candidates, Hillary is out of it. I posted earlier, that our choices were Obama or McCain. I'm for the better of those two. I won't waste my vote on a non-contender as a matter of principle or objection. We're stuck with one of these two candidates for the next for years, like it or not, unless one of them dies in office. I'm for the better of those two candidates. I'll consider their gun ownership position, their energy policy, their policy on the war against terrorism, their committment to using our financial and military power wisely rather than foolishly, and <em>Iraq was a foolish waste of our resources.</em> [Edge - I lied... the Iraq foolishness by Bush was for you. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" />]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pdvdh, post: 210978, member: 4191"] Edge, You'll have to find someone to fight with other than me. Some people can discuss politics without getting their panties in a wad, and some can't. You don't know what you get and don't get about me. And you can't know what you don't know, which is who I hate or don't hate, or what I think about Bush, or Clinton, or anyone else. Cripes. Talk about wrapped around the axle. In my first interaction with you on this forum it's pretty clear that politics discussions are a waste of time with you. Your aggresive post won't win over many converts to your political position. Be FOR something. Exactly what are you implying. Something positive about me? That I'm an intelligent person? An independent thinker who isn't swayed by other's antics or manipulation? I guess that's what you meant. Makes me feel warm and fuzzy. FOR typed in capital letters... is that supposed to impress me or others? I'm comfortable with my prior post. Wouldn't change a thing. To everyone other than Edge I post this: With respect to the presidential candidates, Hillary is out of it. I posted earlier, that our choices were Obama or McCain. I'm for the better of those two. I won't waste my vote on a non-contender as a matter of principle or objection. We're stuck with one of these two candidates for the next for years, like it or not, unless one of them dies in office. I'm for the better of those two candidates. I'll consider their gun ownership position, their energy policy, their policy on the war against terrorism, their committment to using our financial and military power wisely rather than foolishly, and [I]Iraq was a foolish waste of our resources.[/I] [Edge - I lied... the Iraq foolishness by Bush was for you. :D] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
Ron Paul
Top