Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Revic or Leica 3200 ?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="redneckbmxer24" data-source="post: 3099868" data-attributes="member: 11459"><p>I was less than impressed with the Leicas and the Revics are expensive for being basically Chinese (Myanmar) so I wouldn't even entertain them. I also don't care for the company and those who are involved with it.</p><p></p><p>I've got the EL Range TA's and love them but I prioritize glass and ballistics first and techiness very low. The glass is second to none and I can't even tell any difference between them and my NL's and EL's. They absolutely have the glass department the most squared away. The gadgetry certainly isn't the best of the best but it has what I need and I like that it allows me to store 3 rifle profiles at a time compared to one on the Leica. The ballistic program and onboard ballistics work excellent, it tracks 100% with my Kestrel AB and real world on target. Setting up the profiles isn't the most intuitive but once you figure it out it's as easy as anything else. IMO the only drawback to them is lack of windage but it's really a non issue since I keep a simple dope chart on my rifles and wind drift isn't effected as much by atmospheric conditions as drop so I just use that for wind data once I get my distance and dope which has been a flawless system so far.</p><p></p><p>Assuming that the Vector X has onboard ballistics and doesn't rely on a Kestrel for data which I haven't seen confirmed anywhere, I think they'll be hard to beat at $1K less than the Swaros. I really like the magnification enhancers too, that will essentially give a user two binos in one unit. A lower mag for offhand use and good FOV as well as a higher mag for spotting while LR shooting or finding distant animals. I think the 10x with the enhancers would be money.</p><p></p><p>I won't be giving up my Swaros for them though because I enjoy the glass and use them more for wildlife viewing than for shooting. Once you become accustomed to Swaro glass it's really hard to take a step down even if it's a marginal difference.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="redneckbmxer24, post: 3099868, member: 11459"] I was less than impressed with the Leicas and the Revics are expensive for being basically Chinese (Myanmar) so I wouldn’t even entertain them. I also don’t care for the company and those who are involved with it. I’ve got the EL Range TA’s and love them but I prioritize glass and ballistics first and techiness very low. The glass is second to none and I can’t even tell any difference between them and my NL’s and EL’s. They absolutely have the glass department the most squared away. The gadgetry certainly isn’t the best of the best but it has what I need and I like that it allows me to store 3 rifle profiles at a time compared to one on the Leica. The ballistic program and onboard ballistics work excellent, it tracks 100% with my Kestrel AB and real world on target. Setting up the profiles isn’t the most intuitive but once you figure it out it’s as easy as anything else. IMO the only drawback to them is lack of windage but it’s really a non issue since I keep a simple dope chart on my rifles and wind drift isn’t effected as much by atmospheric conditions as drop so I just use that for wind data once I get my distance and dope which has been a flawless system so far. Assuming that the Vector X has onboard ballistics and doesn’t rely on a Kestrel for data which I haven’t seen confirmed anywhere, I think they’ll be hard to beat at $1K less than the Swaros. I really like the magnification enhancers too, that will essentially give a user two binos in one unit. A lower mag for offhand use and good FOV as well as a higher mag for spotting while LR shooting or finding distant animals. I think the 10x with the enhancers would be money. I won’t be giving up my Swaros for them though because I enjoy the glass and use them more for wildlife viewing than for shooting. Once you become accustomed to Swaro glass it’s really hard to take a step down even if it’s a marginal difference. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Revic or Leica 3200 ?
Top