Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Equipment Discussions
Reasonable bipod
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="orkan" data-source="post: 2611820" data-attributes="member: 25377"><p>There is no question. B&T products are superior for shooting small. Their Super-CAL provides the best support outside of a full size F-class bipod that I've found. Arguably better than most of them. </p><p></p><p>A huge number of students arrive here with harris bipods, and leave with plans to buy an Atlas PSR or Super-CAL when they leave. The results on their own rifles, is undeniable and void of any other consideration. They shoot better with B&T products, than they do with any others. If we relax the demands of accuracy and precision enough... well then joe-bob with his bean filled sock and duct tape is "just as good." Yet if we keep the demand high enough, there's B&T... and the only way to get better is a full benchrest/F-class rest and a stock designed for that interface. </p><p></p><p>For field rifles, B&T is the clear winner, and the competition is not close... unless we decrease the demand from 1/4MOA to 1/2MOA. If we're upward of half moa, then nearly anything will do. </p><p></p><p>----------- </p><p><a href="https://www.instagram.com/primalrights" target="_blank">Follow on Instagram</a></p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/primalrights" target="_blank">Subscribe on YouTube</a></p><p><a href="https://amzn.to/3txlBnp" target="_blank">Amazon Affiliate</a></p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.primalrights.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://primalrights.com/images/signatures/sig1.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="orkan, post: 2611820, member: 25377"] There is no question. B&T products are superior for shooting small. Their Super-CAL provides the best support outside of a full size F-class bipod that I've found. Arguably better than most of them. A huge number of students arrive here with harris bipods, and leave with plans to buy an Atlas PSR or Super-CAL when they leave. The results on their own rifles, is undeniable and void of any other consideration. They shoot better with B&T products, than they do with any others. If we relax the demands of accuracy and precision enough... well then joe-bob with his bean filled sock and duct tape is "just as good." Yet if we keep the demand high enough, there's B&T... and the only way to get better is a full benchrest/F-class rest and a stock designed for that interface. For field rifles, B&T is the clear winner, and the competition is not close... unless we decrease the demand from 1/4MOA to 1/2MOA. If we're upward of half moa, then nearly anything will do. ----------- [URL='https://www.instagram.com/primalrights']Follow on Instagram[/URL] [URL='https://www.youtube.com/user/primalrights']Subscribe on YouTube[/URL] [URL='https://amzn.to/3txlBnp']Amazon Affiliate[/URL] [URL='http://www.primalrights.com'][IMG]http://primalrights.com/images/signatures/sig1.jpg[/IMG][/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Equipment Discussions
Reasonable bipod
Top