JE, curious what is the difference in size between the 2 reamers? Sounds like you probably have some of your own and might be able to shed some light, I check PTG to try and see if they have information online but couldn't find anything.
Looking at a few SAAMI drawing it looks like ~ .0005 clearance between the case and the chamber for the most part(.001 difference in diameters for .0005 clearance all the way around) so it makes sense that the same reamer would result in a die that is larger than it needs to be to size the brass back down to proper dimension. However it seems this would only be a problem in new brass. In my little brain it seems fire formed brass wouldn't need the case to be sized at the web. If I understand what's going on inside the sizing die, the only time that portion of the die would come into play it seems would be when bumping the shoulder back. During that process the case length from shoulder to base is being shortened which would cause the OD to want to get larger, so the ID of the die determines to what extent it can grow. In this instance the sizing die is preventing the case OD from getting bigger rather than sizing it down to a smaller OD. So I think it would stand to reason that a die the exact same size as the chamber would result in a more appropriately sized case body if in fact my thinking is correct and the die is preventing the case from growing as opposed to squeezing it to a smaller dimension.
Now this all goes out the window with any brass that is not fire formed, because if the brass is too large and needs to be sized to a smaller OD, then having a die ID the same size would result in brass not fitting into the chamber because of spring back.
If I'm thinking correctly:
1. (Not fire formed)oversized brass being squeezed to a smaller OD springs back to a larger OD than the ID of the die.
2.(Fire formed) Undersized brass while bumping the shoulder back would be expanding to a larger OD, until contacting the die, then would spring back to a smaller OD than the ID of the die. Resulting in a case to chamber clearance equivalent to the "spring back dimension"