Razor HD Gen II 4.5-27x56 vs ATACR 5.5x25x56mm

[Fotis]

Currently building a custom 375 Cheytac and I can not decide between these two scopes. Can anyone help me out?

I like the FFP of the Razor (do not even know if it is needed to be honest) but hate the 48 ounces!
The NF does have a great reputation for sure. So with glass quality, tracking, durability, or anything else I can not think about, what would you choose?

 

[Fotis]

We can throw the Razor HD AMG6-24x50 FFP in the mix also

 

[Rumup]

i go ATACR but the 7-35

 

[Fotis]

Man that $3k plus hurts though!

 

[ar10ar15man]

only hurts once...
100 moa internal 35x power..whats not to love
( i have one but used it yet, still building the rifle)

Man that $3k plus hurts though!

 

[Fotis]

You're right it only hurts one's but $3,600 hurts a lot for once

 

[yoteslayer]

I would go atacr to I would watch the classifieds you see them on there quite often there is a second focal plan one on there now if your not set on ffp

 

[North Idaho Hunter]

I have the 4-16 F1, and the razor gen ii.

while the 4-16 is slightly different then 5-25 - the comparison to vortex is the same.

I would take the F1 over the vortex every day of the week. I prefer the MOART reticle myself, its more practical for my shooting style.

while I have not had any issues with the gen ii, the clarity from the NF far surpasses the vortex along with overall easier turret manipulation, included throw lever and ease of use of the illumination.

just my own experience

 

[Rumup]

I've personally went from a 5-25 to the 7-35 and believe its worth the extra just my opinion.

 

[ar10ar15man]

actually if you shop it can be less...mine was 3200

You're right it only hurts one's but $3,600 hurts a lot for once

 

[MkJose]

Tag

 

[kobraken]

I have the Razor and love everything about it except the weight!!!

 

[KyCarl]

I have both and the ATACR C-545 is a better scope. It's big It's heavy And it WORKS!
The Razor works also..but it's not the same?

 

[jehu]

I have 14 NF scopes. If it were me I would go with the NXS 8X32X56 2DD reticle. I have a couple ATACRS and in my opinion they don't bring enough to make a difference to justify the extra cost over the NXS. I don't puch paper, only when sighting in, so all my experance is hunting. I can't speak to bench rest competition shooting.