G
Guest
Guest
[ QUOTE ]
You want to measure the part of the bullet that is touching the bore bore right? Well, measuring closer to .338 than .330 is not doing that...
[/ QUOTE ]
No, not if the the material with minimal distortion has an insignificant frictional component.
[ QUOTE ]
It probably makes no difference though, and I'd bet money it (method) gets lost in the noise...
JB
[/ QUOTE ]
Double Ditto - That is Before I read the remarks of <font color="red">uncleB</font>. I put him in the Kirby/GG camp where experience is 10,000 x more important than analysis.
BTW, did you [ QUOTE ]
call John Buhay and see what diameter he makes the holes in the bushings that Tubb sells as the BSC
[/ QUOTE ] ?
It's possible <font color="red">uncleB</font> is right about the superiority of the Tubbs tool but for the wrong reason (but I doubt it.)
You want to measure the part of the bullet that is touching the bore bore right? Well, measuring closer to .338 than .330 is not doing that...
[/ QUOTE ]
No, not if the the material with minimal distortion has an insignificant frictional component.
[ QUOTE ]
It probably makes no difference though, and I'd bet money it (method) gets lost in the noise...
JB
[/ QUOTE ]
Double Ditto - That is Before I read the remarks of <font color="red">uncleB</font>. I put him in the Kirby/GG camp where experience is 10,000 x more important than analysis.
BTW, did you [ QUOTE ]
call John Buhay and see what diameter he makes the holes in the bushings that Tubb sells as the BSC
[/ QUOTE ] ?
It's possible <font color="red">uncleB</font> is right about the superiority of the Tubbs tool but for the wrong reason (but I doubt it.)