Popapi
Well-Known Member
Get it!
If ANYONE is having problems with a CED Charles Hardy will go out of his way to make SURE the problem is rectified. My CED is 2nd to NONE.
NO WAY like I said earlier in the post you quoted me saying "My CED is 2nd to NONE." I meant that it's NOT 2nd to NONE, my CED is SOLID 90% of the problem one have or I hear about is the operator and not the unit. All the years I've had mine there has been NO problems ZERO ZILCH.OK. Curiosity is killing the cat. Why the change of mind? Did you just come across some information that tilted you towards the 35P?
Get it!
Now I'll have 3. Phorwath, what kind of set up can we make with 3 chronographs?
I was talking to jmason as per him saying he's taking the jump to the 35P. I should have quoted his post my bad.OK. Then I must have misinterpreted this post. I thought you were stating get the 35P. You must have meant something else.
"If mine are analog, I can tell you that analog does as good a job as I need "
Chronographs are digital, not analog. All of them.
To say the least the Oehler 35p is a OLD but pretty doggone good chrono, those that are coming out in limited quantities are not new technology they are the same 35p's of the yesteryears, which are analog systems compared to the CED digital systems. To say the least if I had to buy another chrono other than a CED it WOULD be a Oehler 35P
To clarify the statement you quoted me saying above. The Oehler is designed 24+ years ago. At that time, all circuitry was analog in design. For example, the program in the Oehler takes 2.9 seconds to register a shot. It functions on a 4mHz chip. IT is accurate, so I always tell ANYBODY that if they do not want a CED, the only other accurate system on the market is Oehler. However, it has limited functions, it is not designed well in regard to the 2 ft. bracket, the wing nut screws, and the dimple on the bracket that you need to ACCURATELY match up for good results.I guess this is the post talking about 35P analog systems versus CED digital systems. Exactly what was meant by that statement? I could not say.