Braunschweiger
Well-Known Member
Firstly, I've owned pretty much every NF out there. This year, I bought a new NX8 2.5-20x50 for rifle season here in Central MO and while I really like the scope, the low end is not very usable. A lot of my shots can be within 30-40 yards if not closer. However, I do need more of the top end as I will be taking this rifle/optic out west in the coming years.
Since right at the moment I don't have a 4-16x50 F1 to compare it to, I wondered if anyone had a preference for one over the other as far as the reticle? I feel the glass in the ATACR is step up - edge to edge clarity, less CA, and overall brightness... but with the obvious cons of lower power and weight.
Let me know!
Darin
Since right at the moment I don't have a 4-16x50 F1 to compare it to, I wondered if anyone had a preference for one over the other as far as the reticle? I feel the glass in the ATACR is step up - edge to edge clarity, less CA, and overall brightness... but with the obvious cons of lower power and weight.
Let me know!
Darin