NF MOAR T Reticle Question

[Sykes]

I have previously had a NF NXS 5.5-22x56 and the only thing I didnt like about it was the reticle was a little heavy/thick for me. I'm considering getting another NF but this time with the thinner MOAR T reticle.

Anybody have experience with this reticle? Is it too thin? How does it compare to a Leupold TMOA reticle, a reticle I am familiar with a like a bunch. I'm 3 hrs from a store that might carry that scope so going to check one out isnt possible, even more so with the covid crap.

Appreciate the input

 

[Sykes]

I should add this scope will be for shooting steel and paper 75% and 25% hunting

 

[Rick Richard]

I have both the NF MOART and the Leuopy TMOAR. I love them both and I think maybe the NF is a bit more fine. I really like these reticles and they would be a good choice for your intended usage.

 

[ShtrRdy]

The MOAR-T is kinda thin but if you're gonna be shooting steel and paper it's really nice.

 

[Doc88]

I have the MOART reticle in a SFP ATACR. Absolutely hands down my favorite reticle of any scope I've ever had. Not too thin. Great for precision shooting and big enough for game. I also like that the illumination is the middle cross hair only and not the whole reticle. Does not drown out the target at low light.

 

[milo-2]

We are all different as to what we see. I have had many NXS scopes with the MOAR, one MOAR-T, the T was too thin for me. Certain light conditions made it hard to pick up. If I was shooting white paper for score, I may have enjoyed it, not the case though.
Being as though I do not like to hover on a target, thinner reticles become slower for me.