Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
The Basics, Starting Out
My thoughts on solid copper bullets and in comparison to other bullet types.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Petey308" data-source="post: 2330129" data-attributes="member: 106845"><p>I'd be curious to see if going by such high SG will truly eliminate that issue. Ironically, statistics and sample size for data was brought up in another one of my posts, and I'd say it applies here too. I'm not sure how many samples would need to happen though before you can feel confident in the reliability and predictability. No bullet is without its potential for anomaly, so I wouldn't think one "failure" would necessarily conclude it doesn't work. Even a few out of hundreds wouldn't necessarily be unacceptable, yet would be frustrating. If it happens in a 20 round sample though, I'd think that could be cause for rejection. Consider a typical box of ammo is 20 rounds, so if a hunter goes out on a hunt and loses an animal due to a random failure of even one round in that box, typically that hunter has no desire to keep using that ammo. </p><p></p><p>So I certainly hope the high SG works and makes them much more reliable and predictable. Every bullet goes through phases with development and improvements.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Petey308, post: 2330129, member: 106845"] I’d be curious to see if going by such high SG will truly eliminate that issue. Ironically, statistics and sample size for data was brought up in another one of my posts, and I’d say it applies here too. I’m not sure how many samples would need to happen though before you can feel confident in the reliability and predictability. No bullet is without its potential for anomaly, so I wouldn’t think one “failure” would necessarily conclude it doesn’t work. Even a few out of hundreds wouldn’t necessarily be unacceptable, yet would be frustrating. If it happens in a 20 round sample though, I’d think that could be cause for rejection. Consider a typical box of ammo is 20 rounds, so if a hunter goes out on a hunt and loses an animal due to a random failure of even one round in that box, typically that hunter has no desire to keep using that ammo. So I certainly hope the high SG works and makes them much more reliable and predictable. Every bullet goes through phases with development and improvements. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
The Basics, Starting Out
My thoughts on solid copper bullets and in comparison to other bullet types.
Top