It's all relative. What are you looking for in a bullet?
I look at it this way:
Barnes crushes bone, & is known for penetration, but does less tissue damage than say Berger
Vs
Berger which is known for less penetration, & but more tissue damage, & higher B.C.
I'm right in the middle for what I want from a bullet.
Id rather have the Accubond for better B.C. than the Barnes, & a bit more tissue damage, & expansion at lower velocity.
Id also rather have the Accubond for the tougher construction, & penetration than the Berger, & give up a bit in B.C.
I have hered literally TONS of good & bad about all three mentioned.
I really respect Broz, & value his knowledge, & skill, & he swears by Berger. but I still won't shoot Bergers cause they don't typically do what I want from a bullet.
I respect LTLR, & his skill, & knowledge, & he swears by C3 but I won't pay that much for C3 bullets.
Neither shooter is more right or wrong than the other. They just have different expectations of terminal bullet performance, & probably even hunting styles. Eventhough they both shoot LR Very well.
Now I'm not even in the same league as either of those two guys, but I prefer Accubonds as the best of both worlds for what I expect of a bullet in terminal performance, & my hunting style. I hunt form 0 to ? yds. depending on the critter I'm after. I don't want to use a fragile LR Berger at close range, & high velocity, & I don't want to use a tough as nails Barnes at LR for lack of b.c. & expansion. Then there's C3 which I can't afford to shoot, & I'm more than satisfied with Accubonds anyway.
So, again its all relative. Your hunting style, & expectations of terminal performance will have to dictate what's "best"