March scopes

[Send it 284]

I'm looking for some feedback from anyone who's spent some time behind march scopes
Particularly the 3-24×52, or 5-42×56.
I've heard mixed reviews about touchy eye box and parallax

 

[BEEMAN]

I've only got 100 rounds of 25-284 experience with my March. I found the eye box was good and parallax was also good. I wouldn't hesitate to get one. My biggest problem since getting the March, is that now I want another one!

 

[CA48]

The eye box issues were with earlier gens. I have the 3-24x52. No issues and I've never found the parallax touchy. Its my preferred hunting scope, il be getting another one.

 

[Wedgy]

March Scopes, Tough Enough?

Not to derail a different threads, I thought I would start this one. On the thread toughest long range scopes, March is hardly mentioned. When March does get brought up in other threads everyone talks about how great and tough they are. Are they really as tough as a Nightforce, US Optics, etc...

www.longrangehunting.com

MARCH 3 - 24 x 42 The perfect mountain rifle scope?

Yesterday a member here suggested I look at MARCH scopes for my new 6.5 CM Browning X-Bolt Pro. It was very eye-opening. (no pun intended) I've head of the excellence of MARCH glass for F Class competition scopes but had no idea they made other scopes. Their 3 - 24 x 42 scopes in FFP and mil or...

www.longrangehunting.com

 

[Troutslayer2]

I'm about to buy a second 3-24 for hunting. I can not find anything I don't like about this scope. At first I thought parallax was touchy but after getting used to it, It's a non-issue.

 

[338weatherby]

Tagging in on this. I've had one in my cart more than once and haven't pulled the trigger. 3-24 illuminated. Just not sure between 42 or 52.

 

[snox801]

I just got the 2.5-25 and I can say I see no issues. In fact like said I'm now wanting to start replacing other Great scope with them.
I haven't had much time with it but it's very nice.

 

[Frank in the Laurels]

Great clarity if you want to lighten your wallet up a ton...

 

[sp6x6]

Ive had one since spring of 2015,rides on a 7-2oz 338NM. Shot alot of stuff with this set up.Likes- compact,low turrets,good ZS,mil,light weight.Donts- my paralax is picky and takes time away from me on high mag long shot,Scope looses crispness at 20x,my Mark 5 on 25x blowes it away, it compares to my mark 4.Cost high,so it should be better,than my mark 5.At dusk I can see the barbs on wire 1/4 mile from my house with mark 5 ,not so with March 3-24x52

 

[Send it 284]

Good to hear some positive feedback.
I've been going round and round about getting a 3-24×52 for awhile now.
I stumbled into a 20% off promo and ordered the new 4.5-28×52 with the wide angle lense and high master glass.
I'll be impatiently starting my 6 week wait

 

[Alberta Boy]

Running 2 March 5-50's on a 7LRM and 6.5x284, love them both. Just purchased a 2.5-25 last week for a light weight build, they are superb. I have a friend who owns 3 or 4 of them and he's a great testing ground, runs them hard and often and he's not seen any failure. When they do catch on in North America they will surpass some brands we are more used to hearing about.

 

[338weatherby]

Good to hear some positive feedback.
I've been going round and round about getting a 3-24×52 for awhile now.
I stumbled into a 20% off promo and ordered the new 4.5-28×52 with the wide angle lense and high master glass.
I'll be impatiently starting my 6 week wait

Can I ask about the promo? I haven't seen any?

 

[Send it 284]

Can I ask about the promo? I haven't seen any?

Yeah it was a shot show promo that long range supply was offering.
Its over now, sorry I should have posted a link earlier

 

[338weatherby]

Yeah it was a shot show promo that long range supply was offering.
Its over now, sorry I should have posted a link earlier

Thanks. I see Long Range Supply looks to have good pricing.